Unliking CL Competition

[Nagu S Baragi]

Why the hell we can't win easiest match without adding WIN Bonus? It seems like they are always favourable to weak teams if we didn't add win bonus?

[Arion]

Why the hell we can't win easiest match without adding WIN Bonus? It seems like they are always favourable to weak teams if we didn't add win bonus?

That was ridiculous... On the other hand, I won 3-0 without bonus.

Actually 4-4-1-1 is a very bleak and defensive formation. You have to stretch out the defence to create chances. Try formation with wingers, like 4-2-3-1, 4-3-2-1, 4-5-1V, 5-2-2-1. 4-2-2-2, HELL NO, the defence is very bleak, for the last 2 seasons I've lost every match with that.
I'd recommend the 5-2-2-1 or 4-3-2-1; 4-5-1V, again, can be very low scoring, but doesn't concede much.

[Nagu S Baragi]

In CL nothing works for me if I didn't put WIN Bonus
Season 6 I played with this formation i put win bonus in CL & beat stronger teams
Season 5&4&3 didn't put win bonus I got draw to weaker team of my group table
In CL if u don't put win bonus even weakest team can beat you or draw this is rubbish

[hedayatm96]

I leage 6 I put win bounce but lost the game I decided to change formation to 4-1-4-1 for the next match and waiting for good result.
What is your idea about this formation?

Sent from my C5303 using Tapatalk

[Arion]

I leage 6 I put win bounce but lost the game I decided to change formation to 4-1-4-1 for the next match and waiting for good result.
What is your idea about this formation?

Sent from my C5303 using Tapatalk

The attacking combination, IMO, should be any one of these:
•ST-ST
•AML-ST-AMR
•ST-AMC-ST
•AML-AMC-AMR-ST

This is what I've thought on paper. Nagu generally plays 4-4-1-1, so he's facing unsatisfactory results.
Another combination can be AML-ST-ST-AMR, but it's way too attacking. I'll never go for 5 man in the AM-ST region. So the most attacking formation you can go, without compromising on the defence or midfield, is the 3N-3N-2W-2. In season 5 I experimented a bit with 3-man formations, and I slayed a tanking guy 11-0. I found this formation to be the most attacking.

@Nagu S Baragi, you should be desperately in for a change in tactics.

[hedayatm96]

The attacking combination, IMO, should be any one of these:
•ST-ST
•AML-ST-AMR
•ST-AMC-ST
•AML-AMC-AMR-ST

This is what I've thought on paper. Nagu generally plays 4-4-1-1, so he's facing unsatisfactory results.
Another combination can be AML-ST-ST-AMR, but it's way too attacking. I'll never go for 5 man in the AM-ST region. So the most attacking formation you can go, without compromising on the defence or midfield, is the 3N-3N-2W-2. In season 5 I experimented a bit with 3-man formations, and I slayed a tanking guy 11-0. I found this formation to be the most attacking.

@Nagu S Baragi, you should be desperately in for a change in tactics.

At first I use st~St but my team just only socered 1 goal in 4 match after that I change it to 4-1-4-1 and want to test it 😢

Sent from my C5303 using Tapatalk

[Arion]

At first I use st~St but my team just only socered 1 goal in 4 match after that I change it to 4-1-4-1 and want to test it 😢

Sent from my C5303 using Tapatalk

Try aml-st-amr, the wingers will pounce on their defence.