Attachment 65672
Printable View
LOL you sold him... well... my GK is still a nightmare of the team LOL~ but the funny thing was, if i blench my own GK for 1 or 2 match... and then put him back to 1st team, he will be good again (like rate 8)Quote:
Originally Posted by Gert Funck
He will return back to his bad form after a few matches, you will see. Currently, I'm playing with my lower quality GK too as the other that seemed to be the superior one visually in terms of quality is '****' in terms of performances on the pitch. He is probably one the reasons why my team was knocked-out at the 1/8 round of CL this season. Ratings of 8 for GK may be illusions. Many GKs that appear to be doing nothing significant are earning ratings of 8 (7.4-7.6) This has already been discussed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ahlony Wong
P.S: I have had 6-7 star GKs in the past, including one from the scouts' list. There displayed qualities appear to be illusions. There performances on the pitch have been very inferior to what it is expected for such players.
well, with my own action GK, he is kind of nightmare of other team beside the CUP...which is facing higher Q and higher LV team...and he was trained in the old system, which means his GK skill is lower than the physical... (his physical is like... @90 +...while GK skill is in scout level LOL)
i mean good is he make save...and the rate 6 one, (in the CUP, opposite shot on target 6...goal 3.... ) i put him in sub for the next 3 matches, put him back to CUP against the same time, i won't 3:0 in away... LOL
on the other hand, the recommend GK...yes he is nightmare...but not for attacker, is for my team...like i said before LOL, everytime he is on...opposite find the net... and you see his rate (and i know the GK rating, i am only talking my these two GK) LOL
Attachment 65682
Attachment 65683
What! Wauw! I am speechless, another keeper :rolleyes:
Attachment 66010
I got 2 GK recommendations in a row. And guess what? During both of those particular days, my GK 'played' badly. Coincidence?Quote:
Originally Posted by Gert Funck
We got recommended str/AMR but too late in season plus I got one earlier some Def would be nice
Attachment 66189:rolleyes:
2 star... *takes out glasses* MOTHER OF GODQuote:
Originally Posted by Gert Funck
(BTW I don't wear glasses)
Attachment 66237
Looking for something special from this guy as he goes into the second season
did you drop your Q that much ? hahaQuote:
Originally Posted by Gert Funck
Casuals have some recommendations today - and holymotherof... not STs!!!!
Attachment 66246
Some of them are good,expecially on next seasons,some of them are nothing exceptional all time long they're in my team.
I usually buy the best choice,infact why save tokens to buy lower choices you powertrain later on,spending many other tokens?
The issue is how repetitive proposed roles are:
always ST/AMC/AML_AMR and GK; nothing else but these.
I've got lots of strikers,so i often plays formations like 4-2-2-2 hexagon, 4-2-3W-1 and similar,to exploit so many offensive players.
I'm not buying GK at this moment,as I have at least one effordable GK and a good enough reserve.
This feature should be customized according to manager's required players and roles .
Still, 55T for U21 scout is extremely good.Quote:
Originally Posted by talisman
I think that this feature is another example of a good idea ruined by Nordeus. Like negociation. Who wants to pay 13 tokens when only 2 go into the selling manager's pocket ?
And know this recommended players feature... I used to get fantastic players worth 79 tokens. Now it is only 4 stars for 19 tokens. Once a week. And you do not even have the option to choose the position of the recommended player. Very sad...
AMC: ball-winner centre?Quote:
Originally Posted by talisman
Another football nonsense.
That should be for DMCs.
AMC: well-rounded midfielder?
In that case, it should be DMC/MC or MC/AMC or DMC/MC/AMC.
Even 'the professor' is wrong. That should be for a DMC/MC playmaker.
It is clear that the terms used are not appropriate for the positions here. Flaw?
Nordeus is greedy.Quote:
Originally Posted by gizzmo
Even half/half would have been acceptable compared to what it is now.
that's not funny at all :p:p:pQuote:
Originally Posted by nikolgiorgos
...and if I needed one at that position I'd probably take up the offer, but no...Quote:
Originally Posted by Arion
Of course. Why would I spend 55T, to sell that player?Quote:
Originally Posted by talisman
Some people like doing collections. So, probably Nordeus are targeting those type of users. :pQuote:
Originally Posted by Arion
The professor...wow! .....I think Pirlo should have that nicknameQuote:
Originally Posted by talisman
Wauw, what a surprise a fresh bunch of keepers! Attachment 66471
Just go away stupid recommeded players... Nordeus clearly don't want my money :p
Attachment 66659Attachment 66660
Attachment 66661
Well,..,, for 3T is a good option to exchange Tokens per cash selling this playerQuote:
Originally Posted by Gert Funck
Wauw! Another keeper
Attachment 66692
But for you, they should be 'perfect additions' given the fact that you use GKs for taking free-kicks and corners. :pQuote:
Originally Posted by Gert Funck
Maybe, for those GKs, the game even boost the attributes required for taking free-kicks and corners so that they can fit to your tactics. An area commander will be useful to take free-kicks and corners as he will be able to command those particular areas. How about trying to play with 11 GKs - 1 GK at the posts, and 10 GKs as outfield players? With all those GKs, you can get 11 GKs in the starting line-up.
(joke)
By the way, keep an eye on how your GKs for this particular team perform today. Report back any poor performances or anomalies.
the recommended GK suck ~LOL my last one...19/20 game...he can't keep a clean sheet...even against a weak team...LOL
Today's Casuals Recommendations - the AM has gone all out to be different - DLs!?
Attachment 66730
Probably 15 STs in a row and still going... I WON'T GET THEM
Guess what! another batch of keepers yaaaaiiiii! :rolleyes:
Attachment 67032
keepers maybe terrible... my recommend GK is still doing ....terrible.... he did several games great before....but last night.... facing a a strong team in CUP.... all my DC or DMC rate over 7.... my GK rate 5.7 .... and lost in the ET for 3-1 (away i won 2-1...last night at home 1-1 half time... 71 min 2-1 so..go to ET... 114 min ...3-1....i lost) btw, the recommend ST and AMC are both doing fine.... only terrible in the first season, but now, they are both great.... i wish my GK doing good in next season LOL~Quote:
Originally Posted by Gert Funck
Soon the game will give you the 'Ram' achievement, not for being a stubborn bidder but for being stubborn not to buy. :pQuote:
Originally Posted by Arion
By the way, so far, I did not bought any recommended players.
I'd bought one, still they're recommending it...Quote:
Originally Posted by Tactician
I need a new scout, I am tired of having Peter Shilton :rolleyes:
78 tokens for one player is just too much, if it was 30 I would actually look at buying them....if they weren't strikers every single season.
yea~ 79 token is too much~ especially they cut the free token from watching video.... well...they force people to buy token instead earning free things~Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Nifield
Please, please, please - no more strikers!!!!
Casuals:
Attachment 67551
Terriers:
Attachment 67552Attachment 67553
Further to the previous post...
Attachment 67727
Palace Casuals' first signing of the season...
