Order of Positions

[nash123]

Today, I saw something, that makes me crazy...




Is there any meaning on the orders of the positions?
First, I thought, it's only which position they currently play, but it isn't.
I also thought, it's only the order, who they learned it - but it isn't it. I looked at this guy and he could play ST/AMR, I learned him AMC...


Maybe it's their favorite position?

Are their experience?

[Abhinavsharma]

It is random.
Because we can't write 3 position in one position lol
But it is possible for player using both foot.We say it either foot rather than left foot,right foot.
Can you predict fav foot from either foot lol

[Tactician]

I have noticed the order of the positions changing, especially after doing training or after playing a match. For instance, DMC/DC to DC/DMC and vice versa. I suspect that the order may be related to the attributes of the player, but for some players it does not make sense. For example, a DR/DC is expected to have better crossing and speed relative to the other attributes related to the DC position, but I had a player that was relative poor in those two attributes and yet the order remained the same in almost 2 seasons despite training him mainly for attributes related to DC position. Maybe there is a flaw in the system that determines the order of the positions, that is it does not always consider the right attributes.

[Arion]

Who gives a damn if they perform good

[Abhinavsharma]

I have noticed the order of the positions changing, especially after doing training or after playing a match. For instance, DMC/DC to DC/DMC and vice versa. I suspect that the order may be related to the attributes of the player, but for some players it does not make sense. For example, a DR/DC is expected to have better crossing and speed relative to the other attributes related to the DC position, but I had a player that was relative poor in those two attributes and yet the order remained the same in almost 2 seasons despite training him mainly for attributes related to DC position. Maybe there is a flaw in the system that determines the order of the positions, that is it does not always consider the right attributes.

Do you think so muccch?

[nash123]

Who gives a damn if they perform good

I had a Defender who could play DL and DC - in the order DL/DC. I always set him left DC. Two weeks he performed around 5-6. My regular DL was blocked for one game. I only had another "single" DC, so I set the first one DL. I missed this and the following match, checked ratings and the DL/DC got 8 and 9. From that moment, he only plays DL. His best performance is at the cupgames, 9-10 - maybe, because there are equal and better teams. His % increases up to 10% per match. But he is the only player, I've noticed this.

I was just wondering, because in the Old Version, it's alway DL-DC-DR.

[Andrew Nifield]

Its just probably the order they were added to the player (learnt) ive never noticed ones order changing.

[Tactician]

Nash123, post the attributes profile of the that DL/DC. Also post the part where it shows the preferred foot.

[Tactician]

By the way, how are those DL/DC/DR players performing at each of those positions? I have a DC/DR that I intend to train to DL, but it would better to have some feedback on how such players are doing.

[nash123]

Nash123, post the attributes profile of the that DL/DC. Also post the part where it shows the preferred foot.

Left guy is the DL/DC (first DC, now only DL), right guy is the old DL, now he plays mostly DC. His performance on DL, DC and DR is nearly the same. His rating is around 7-9, depents on opponent (if I play against teams on the bottom of the League, there is nothing to do... )
Left guy I bought at age 18, right guy at 19.

It's how I often say - I like my team, my players, so I wanna stay with them.