Shots Efficiency

[nash123]

That's what I wanted to show: statistic says nothing. If you are, and the defenders saved 5 times, it also means, that the keeper was 5 times beaten. If that's true, why he got a rating 7.6? If you don't know, what happened to the 5 SOT, the statistic is useless.
And on the other side... my wife lost 1:0, keeper saved 7, SOT: 8 and he only got a rating 6,7.

I also lost games, where my team was much better on statistics, oppo-keeper saved nothing, mine saved as much as he can, but sillt lost. Statistic is nice, but nothing I will use blind.

[dragonjm]

That's what I wanted to show: statistic says nothing. If you are, and the defenders saved 5 times, it also means, that the keeper was 5 times beaten. If that's true, why he got a rating 7.6? If you don't know, what happened to the 5 SOT, the statistic is useless.
And on the other side... my wife lost 1:0, keeper saved 7, SOT: 8 and he only got a rating 6,7.

I also lost games, where my team was much better on statistics, oppo-keeper saved nothing, mine saved as much as he can, but sillt lost. Statistic is nice, but nothing I will use blind.

If the defenders blocked 5 shots doesn't mean that the GK was beaten, means that the ball was going on target but the defenders blocked it. If they didn't do it, 1 of 2 things would happen, goal or a save.

About GK rating, there is a problem there, a GK can have a clean sheet and get a 7-8 rating without making a single save. And can have a rating 5-6 making a lot of save and conceding 1 or 2 goals. In my view there is a huge penalty in the GK ratings if they concede a goal and if the team wins or not, the number of saves seems less important for the rating.

Statistics are just that, statistics, use them just to see what happened during the game, doesn't mean that the most dominant team will win. Like real football, many teams win games without having more shots than the opposition.