Many say Quality is not the factor in this game, even the admin also say that, but...

Quality is not key factor ??

ok...look at that.... this time is not what i say....your AM finally tell us the truth this time~

he is honest this time finally ~HAHAHA :rolleyes::rolleyes: (btw, will this AM get fire for speaking the truth out? lol )

Attachment 74103

o...yea, look at the stars of my opposit in my CUP~

Attachment 74104

For me quality is one of the three major factors (the other two are presence of the manager in the game/coaching and luck :o ).
Of course the q of a player must come together with the good performance in the field.

I have a cup manipulator player :) Sometimes he is playing a whole match against normal teams (not abandons)

i had to realize most important factor is form when you are playing against similar or not so strong(er) player :) of course if you are playing with low star team against 9-"10"* star team you gonna lose in long term :)

behold:Attachment 74105

quality is the main key factor, that's why this game became a treasure-green packs hunt, so the managers are looking for tricks to gain more and more...

And his goal against 7* GK :)

he is somewhere between -3 and -4* if i'm doing teh math good :)

Attachment 74106

As we can see the first pic of Ahlony, if this team had also a 1* player, it wouldn't make much difference
but you can't go far with a team of 3-4-5* players (but good performers)

Quality doesn't matter, if it's close enough. I think, range is around 20-30%. Everything else is just luck and tactic.

Look at this... Chri is a FA member and RL-friend. He is the weakest active manager... but do you think, 5 points to 3.place is only luck? Btw... he made 4 points vs the strongest team, Znan (beside me).
He made 3 points vs 4th (2nd game isn't played)
He made 4 points vs 5th
He made 3 points vs 6th
He made 3 points vs 7th (2nd game isn't played)
and so on.

Attachment 74127

Attachment 74128

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nikolgiorgos

For me quality is one of the three major factors (the other two are presence of the manager in the game/coaching and luck :o ).
Of course the q of a player must come together with the good performance in the field.

---

I disagree...i am always present in the game...and i lose regulary from better teams, specialy in the cup and CL. Even if i win first game 2:0 against player 2lvls above...i lose 5:1 in return. In this tipe of competition its imposible to win in 2 games.For me its much easier to win against murinho then the other stronger teams. Since this is all about software i exclude the luck.

Послато са GT-I8200 уз помоћ Тапатока

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Albator1

I disagree...i am always present in the game...and i lose regulary from better teams, specialy in the cup and CL. Even if i win first game 2:0 against player 2lvls above...i lose 5:1 in return. In this tipe of competition its imposible to win in 2 games.For me its much easier to win against murinho then the other stronger teams. Since this is all about software i exclude the luck.

Послато са GT-I8200 уз помоћ Тапатока

---

I agree about quality.

Послато са GT-I8200 уз помоћ Тапатока

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nash123

Quality doesn't matter, if it's close enough. I think, range is around 20-30%. Everything else is just luck and tactic.

Look at this... Chri is a FA member and RL-friend. He is the weakest active manager... but do you think, 5 points to 3.place is only luck? Btw... he made 4 points vs the strongest team, Znan (beside me).
He made 3 points vs 4th (2nd game isn't played)
He made 4 points vs 5th
He made 3 points vs 6th
He made 3 points vs 7th (2nd game isn't played)
and so on.

Attachment 74127

Attachment 74128

---

In the league i could even agree with you but CL and cup...no.

Послато са GT-I8200 уз помоћ Тапатока