Care to share your tactics and the ratings page for that match?

One thing I find interesting about AM reports like this is that the programming has found 2 different criteria in the game stats that each return these 2 comments. They don't make sense to us, but do to the system, so there's "something" to be learned. Like when my GK "had a great match" according to the report, but played for a 6.7... does it mean he did well but was too exposed due to wrong back line formation? Or that 3+ saves triggers that comment regardless of rating?

Maybe defender ratings were high, (but they had little chance due to the quality difference), so they were right players, right formation, right mindset, but tactically either harder tackling or harder defending was needed? Or the possession: shots and corners ratio for opponent was high enough to trigger the "too soft" comment.

I haven't tracked AM comments to tactics or stats, but I do think there's information buried in there.