Quote Originally Posted by nash123 View Post
Today, I saw many troll results... incl our FA:

We played both legs (much) better, not a single statistic was against us, but made only 17:17 and go to final because of the goals.
My Team was 3:1 ahead, we conceeded at 87' and 89' - opponent was 17% weaker.
A member was 4:1 ahead, much better (7:1 SoT), conceeded at 67', 72' and 77', SoT at the 11:5...

The same member lost his CL-quarter 6:3... conceeded 4:0 within the first 16 min - opponent wasn't watching the whole game.


A RL-friend lost 2:3 NML against a 10% stronger team, BUT he was better on stats, played easy tackling/low pressure. Opponent scored first two goals from FK (his freekicker wasn't with FK-SA, and was very low at shooting/finishing)...

Ingame-friend, who goes to cupfinal (against me), struggle a lot in CL against 15% weaker team. Opponent didn't watch... but he scored twice with only 4 SoT, while my friend hat 9 SoT and scored twice... finally he won at extented time 3:2, needed 12 SoT...
Troll results definitely on the rise this season. What annoys me the most are when your team gets trolled against a much weaker opponent, you've maxed out all bonuses, and your opponent is a no show for the game. For some reason the unsupported team gets some hidden bonus to troll the game. Why? They do not deserve it! There really needs to be a penalty implemented for no show managers, and this penalty needs to impact the result.

Also, so annoying to win possession 70-30 or 80-20, and opponent has similar shots??? Once again, this makes no sense. A team dominated by possession cannot possibly have equivalent shots. Build some common sense into the TE engine.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk