Results 1 to 10 of 10
Like Tree4Likes
  • 1 Post By Tyltyl
  • 2 Post By KenoticFC
  • 1 Post By Black Eddy

Thread: illegal set up

  1. #1
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    23

    illegal set up

    why are players allowed to get away with this team formation. it must be illegal with only 2 defenders but i see this quite often and they dont seem to be affected performance wise. anyone puitting out a team like this should get 20% possession shouldnt they? but they do not, i have been against this too many times and i never get 80% possession like i should against illegal formations
    illegal set up-illegals.jpg

  2. #2
    Pro
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    879
    I dont see it is illegal ... actually his formation is quite balanced in my viewpoint regardless of top 11 programmers consider it.

    he's playing with 2 middle defenders making his team pretty secure.

    The 2 defense mid centers on the right and left wings are playing the role of DL and DR if the arrows are set to behind/back.

    you can buy dml and dmr and put them in dl and dr positions .. it works try it

  3. #3
    Dreamer Tyltyl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    453
    The game suggests you not to play with less than 3 defenders, but it actually doesn't make any difference. I tried to play with 2 DC and it worked just fine.
    Also played with no ST, or without players in the opponents side of the field. Still won.
    madflo19 likes this.
    Winning Eleven season records:

    15 Leagues won : 1, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 14, 18, 19, 20, 23, 24, 25, 30, 31, 38 - Runner up: 8, 10, 15
    9 Champions League won: 7, 9, 11, 19, 20, 21, 24, 31, 33 - Runner up: 15, 16, 26, 34
    1 Super League won: 38
    7 Cups won: 17, 18, 20, 23, 24, 33, 35 - Runner up: 9, 14, 34, 38

  4. #4
    Famous KenoticFC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    1,290
    It is basically a "broken" 4-4-2, while it can be applied in real football here the game should either take actions and punish those who play illegal formation or remove the warnings altogether if they are just cosmetic.
    madflo19 and Black Eddy like this.

  5. #5
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Mexico
    Posts
    44
    I'm facing the following (illegal) formation in the next hours:

    1-3-1-3-2

    -------ST---ST-------
    AML--AMC--AMR
    ----------MC---------
    DML---DMC---DMR
    ----------DC---------

    How would you set up your team?

    I was thinking about 4-1-3N-2.
    Last edited by Black Eddy; 10-24-2017 at 05:15 PM. Reason: adding my own formation

  6. #6
    Dreamer
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    494
    Quote Originally Posted by Black Eddy View Post
    I'm facing the following (illegal) formation in the next hours:

    1-3-1-3-2

    -------ST---ST-------
    AML--AMC--AMR
    ----------MC---------
    DML---DMC---DMR
    ----------DC---------

    How would you set up your team?

    I was thinking about 4-1-3N-2.
    illegal set up-screenshot_20171015-174232.jpg

    I will use this, cause they only use 1 DC. Full Attack...

  7. #7
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Mexico
    Posts
    44
    Seriously? Full Attack?

    My Opponent is 6% stronger than me.

  8. #8
    Dreamer
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    494
    Quote Originally Posted by Black Eddy View Post
    Seriously? Full Attack?

    My Opponent is 6% stronger than me.
    What is the result?

  9. #9
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Mexico
    Posts
    44
    I won 1:0 with 4-1-3N-2.
    Very hard game. Changed in 2. Half from def. and counter attacks to normal and high pressing.
    Pangihutan Manik likes this.

  10. #10
    Apprentice RedManc7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by Black Eddy View Post
    Seriously? Full Attack?

    My Opponent is 6% stronger than me.
    full attack


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk