"We aren't concrete enough in our actions. Try setting your team to aim closer to the goal in attack."
Um... Playing 4-4-2 against 4-2-2-2 (hexagon), attacking, high pressing, around 10% higher overall quality. I don't even have AMR/L on the bench, but I do have two AMCs.
I fail to see how this 'advice' has any purpose, it's almost as bad as "We seem to have difficulty scoring, why not try a more direct approach?" when 90% of the goals my team scores is from open play, short passes, and often running round the keeper or tight angles inside the box. Definitely NOT long balls ever and rarely from set pieces.
The times I've followed the ass. advice I've often lost, it was useful at first (probably just a coincidence I won when following it) but now just seems to give wrong and/or odd words of encouragement. I want to sack him and get another one.
I won the game 3-1 (1-1 HT), bringing on an AMC with 40 minutes to go, in place of a centre back. Was the advice good, wrong, cryptic or was my ass. drunk??