Kashiwa Washi - Guess the correct aggregate score contest #6

[Ljepoje]

I agree to disagree, why? First, T11 is like I said: a basic simulation game, or a service. Second, they where both quite equal; Kashiwa Washi (Q48,1) vs DUSSK's FC (Q47,8). I think that Dark.Sidious lost because he had 6 players on the opposite half and only 4 on his own which caused unbalance since the lost he "midfield" battle (unwritten rule). Also the fact that the lvl 8 was much experienced then Dark.Sidious himself.

[jacksparrow]

I agree to disagree, why? First, T11 is like I said: a basic simulation game, or a service. Second, they where both quite equal; Kashiwa Washi (Q48,1) vs DUSSK's FC (Q47,8). I think that Dark.Sidious lost because he had 6 players on the opposite half and only 4 on his own which caused unbalance since the lost he "midfield" battle (unwritten rule). Also the fact that the lvl 8 was much experienced then Dark.Sidious himself.

cracicot make a mistake, counter attack by Ljepoje and blah blah blah HAHAHAHA

[cracicot]

I agree to disagree, why? First, T11 is like I said: a basic simulation game, or a service. Second, they where both quite equal; Kashiwa Washi (Q48,1) vs DUSSK's FC (Q47,8). I think that Dark.Sidious lost because he had 6 players on the opposite half and only 4 on his own which caused unbalance since the lost he "midfield" battle (unwritten rule). Also the fact that the lvl 8 was much experienced then Dark.Sidious himself.

Ljepoje, you realize the latter half of my last post was sarcasm, right? I know they were evenly matched, I was just referring to the many people that complain because they buy tokens and lose and say they pay money to win. I understand buying tokens does not guarantee a win, and in the incapable hands of a retarded mananger, they dont guarantee a quality team.

I feel for Darth in his loss but understand that it was a fair game - token buyer vs token buyer. All I suggested was this game is what I would like to see for EVERY game played, where the lack of tokens ensures that the combination of formation, tactics and quality mean something. A cup match like this one, but without tokens, would be the standard.

Calling this a simulation game is a bit like saying dry-humping is full-on f@cking. There is no sense of realism here with all the bugs and the pre-determined results. BUT for now, lets call it a simulation for arguments sake.

POINT: this cup game was fair as it was token vs token. Too bad he lost. Without tokens, this game would survive.