Quote Originally Posted by Morgan O'Bree View Post
People complaining should learn that buying 11 scouts and playing 3-6-1 V or 3-5-2 V going on crushing things, then losing, isn't how you should play the game. Do you know why most of the tokens buyers loses, or underperforms? Because they are sure they paid to win, while they simply paid to be advanaged in winning. You can have your 5 Q or 10Q better team, but if you go playing 4-4-2 vs a 4-1-2-1-2 or 4-5-1 V then don't complain about losing. And don't complain the fact that you aren't advantaged as you token buyers should be. In facts, it's you yourself giving up that advantage.

Real madrid is full of galactic players yet, what did they win in the last 3 years? It took Inter FC 40 years of superplayers to win CL once.
It's not that quality doesn't matter, but it's a lso a question of tactic. Example:

Click image for larger version. 

Name:	meh.jpg 
Views:	46 
Size:	52.4 KB 
ID:	4971

As per image proving, your classic token buyer thinking he's almighty sitting on 45,5 Q on his effective 11. Playing hence 4-2MC-3AM-1 superoffensive. On the other side a team with 3 injuries using 3 weak reserves, but whith overall a good Q of 28-30 on the field.
3-2-2-2-1 to counter him, with DML/DMR, 3 back, 2 mcs. He played defensive and going for the sides, and won, earning it fair.
Hey man, don't pay so much attention to formations and tactics, they aren't SO importand, thay play a role, sure, but the outcome doesn't come entirely out of them. It isn't chess. There are some players who have a superior team and when they win they think it is because of the tactics but when they lose, what, thay are not so "experts" anymore? Luck plays a very big role here, I don't know if the results are predetermined but sometimes they are quite suspicious. I get dissapointed too when I lose, because I put some effort in this game and I want to get rewarded for that
Peace