Results 1 to 10 of 74
Like Tree46Likes

Thread: once again this game proves his stupidity from day 1

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Famous Morgan O'Bree's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    1,622
    People complaining should learn that buying 11 scouts and playing 3-6-1 V or 3-5-2 V going on crushing things, then losing, isn't how you should play the game. Do you know why most of the tokens buyers loses, or underperforms? Because they are sure they paid to win, while they simply paid to be advanaged in winning. You can have your 5 Q or 10Q better team, but if you go playing 4-4-2 vs a 4-1-2-1-2 or 4-5-1 V then don't complain about losing. And don't complain the fact that you aren't advantaged as you token buyers should be. In facts, it's you yourself giving up that advantage.

    Real madrid is full of galactic players yet, what did they win in the last 3 years? It took Inter FC 40 years of superplayers to win CL once.
    It's not that quality doesn't matter, but it's a lso a question of tactic. Example:

    once again this game proves his stupidity from day 1-meh.jpg

    As per image proving, your classic token buyer thinking he's almighty sitting on 45,5 Q on his effective 11. Playing hence 4-2MC-3AM-1 superoffensive. On the other side a team with 3 injuries using 3 weak reserves, but whith overall a good Q of 28-30 on the field.
    3-2-2-2-1 to counter him, with DML/DMR, 3 back, 2 mcs. He played defensive and going for the sides, and won, earning it fair.
    Last edited by Morgan O'Bree; 04-09-2013 at 05:37 PM.
    gtmsnba13 and Ljepoje like this.

  2. #2
    Apprentice
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    210
    @ Morgan O'Bree A meaningless game after the 1-3 in the first leg
    Last edited by aiureah; 04-09-2013 at 05:42 PM.

  3. #3
    Famous Morgan O'Bree's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    1,622
    Quote Originally Posted by aiureah View Post
    @ Morgan O'Bree A meaningless game after the 1-3 in the first leg
    And why so. Would you call meaningless winning over something 15Q better, and going out just on 4-3 aggregate? Normality would mean getting a 0-6 and 6-0. But you skipped through my point. I was commenting not on Baku, but on Alex Fc: even holding power, using it wrongly can cost you victory even on weak teams. Why? Because tokens alone won't buy you victory, you need at least a lil brain.

    Quote Originally Posted by brezz View Post
    dont speak nonsense pls. u r getting ridiculous
    The game engine sucks. You should have won 10-0. And Nordeus for this one loss should give you back all tokens you spent in these years, ALL.

    Is it this what you would like to read?

    I'm a token buyer too, don't get me wrong. But i rekon tactics are 40% at least of the result. If you want a discussion, here am i. If you want to just wildly wine after 33 months of playing, then tag the post as [epic rant]. Altho, we still would like to see your and his formations.

  4. #4
    Rookie brezz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    122
    Quote Originally Posted by Morgan O'Bree View Post
    And why so. Would you call meaningless winning over something 15Q better, and going out just on 4-3 aggregate? Normality would mean getting a 0-6 and 6-0. But you skipped through my point. I was commenting not on Baku, but on Alex Fc: even holding power, using it wrongly can cost you victory even on weak teams. Why? Because tokens alone won't buy you victory, you need at least a lil brain.



    The game engine sucks. You should have won 10-0. And Nordeus for this one loss should give you back all tokens you spent in these years, ALL.

    Is it this what you would like to read?

    I'm a token buyer too, don't get me wrong. But i rekon tactics are 40% at least of the result. If you want a discussion, here am i. If you want to just wildly wine after 33 months of playing, then tag the post as [epic rant]. Altho, we still would like to see your and his
    formations.
    there is nothing more ridiculous than token buyers. i really laugh at them when they lose. but in fact, even i who did not buy a single token for 32 seasons should say its sad for you guys. sad to lose vs so weak teams, and sad to see you buying again more scout players with the hope "this time i will crush them"
    then again - top11 suck and we know that!!!
    Last edited by brezz; 04-09-2013 at 06:08 PM.

  5. #5
    Famous Morgan O'Bree's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    1,622
    Quote Originally Posted by brezz View Post
    there is nothing more ridiculous than token buyers. i really laugh at them when they lose. but in fact, even i who did not buy a single token for 32 seasons should say its sad for you guys. sad to lose vs so weak teams, and sad to see you buying again more scout players with the hope "this time i will crush them"
    then again - top11 suck and we know that!!!
    So i wonder...if you are so unconcerned, why you bother posting against them? Why brag about you not buying tokens? Why brag about practically anything a token buyer would post?

    You state as you don't give a s**t, but sir, you are a hater, and prolly envious, in the end. The seasons i didn't buy tokens i couldn't care less, like i could care less now that i bought them. Unconcerning doesn't involve blaming. Blaming someone in this way = being envious not to be able to do such.

    Be envious= you'd like to be a token buyer too.

    Face it. You love us
    Carlitos likes this.

  6. #6
    Rookie brezz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    122
    Quote Originally Posted by Morgan O'Bree View Post
    So i wonder...if you are so unconcerned, why you bother posting against them? Why brag about you not buying tokens? Why brag about practically anything a token buyer would post?

    You state as you don't give a s**t, but sir, you are a hater, and prolly envious, in the end. The seasons i didn't buy tokens i couldn't care less, like i could care less now that i bought them. Unconcerning doesn't involve blaming. Blaming someone in this way = being envious not to be able to do such.

    Be envious= you'd like to be a token buyer too.

    Face it. You love us
    LMAO i am doing pretty fine job. i am just disapointed. it's just not fair and i am saying this about losses against non-competitive teams!!!
    now u can go with your nobel prize answer again

  7. #7
    Rookie brezz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    122
    Quote Originally Posted by Morgan O'Bree View Post
    People complaining should learn that buying 11 scouts and playing 3-6-1 V or 3-5-2 V going on crushing things, then losing, isn't how you should play the game. Do you know why most of the tokens buyers loses, or underperforms? Because they are sure they paid to win, while they simply paid to be advanaged in winning. You can have your 5 Q or 10Q better team, but if you go playing 4-4-2 vs a 4-1-2-1-2 or 4-5-1 V then don't complain about losing. And don't complain the fact that you aren't advantaged as you token buyers should be. In facts, it's you yourself giving up that advantage.

    Real madrid is full of galactic players yet, what did they win in the last 3 years? It took Inter FC 40 years of superplayers to win CL once.
    It's not that quality doesn't matter, but it's a lso a question of tactic. Example:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	meh.jpg 
Views:	46 
Size:	52.4 KB 
ID:	4971

    As per image proving, your classic token buyer thinking he's almighty sitting on 45,5 Q on his effective 11. Playing hence 4-2MC-3AM-1 superoffensive. On the other side a team with 3 injuries using 3 weak reserves, but whith overall a good Q of 28-30 on the field.
    3-2-2-2-1 to counter him, with DML/DMR, 3 back, 2 mcs. He played defensive and going for the sides, and won, earning it fair.
    dont speak nonsense pls. u r getting ridiculous
    aiureah likes this.

  8. #8
    Rookie TheGunners's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    139
    Quote Originally Posted by Morgan O'Bree View Post
    People complaining should learn that buying 11 scouts and playing 3-6-1 V or 3-5-2 V going on crushing things, then losing, isn't how you should play the game. Do you know why most of the tokens buyers loses, or underperforms? Because they are sure they paid to win, while they simply paid to be advanaged in winning. You can have your 5 Q or 10Q better team, but if you go playing 4-4-2 vs a 4-1-2-1-2 or 4-5-1 V then don't complain about losing. And don't complain the fact that you aren't advantaged as you token buyers should be. In facts, it's you yourself giving up that advantage.

    Real madrid is full of galactic players yet, what did they win in the last 3 years? It took Inter FC 40 years of superplayers to win CL once.
    It's not that quality doesn't matter, but it's a lso a question of tactic. Example:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	meh.jpg 
Views:	46 
Size:	52.4 KB 
ID:	4971

    As per image proving, your classic token buyer thinking he's almighty sitting on 45,5 Q on his effective 11. Playing hence 4-2MC-3AM-1 superoffensive. On the other side a team with 3 injuries using 3 weak reserves, but whith overall a good Q of 28-30 on the field.
    3-2-2-2-1 to counter him, with DML/DMR, 3 back, 2 mcs. He played defensive and going for the sides, and won, earning it fair.
    Hey man, don't pay so much attention to formations and tactics, they aren't SO importand, thay play a role, sure, but the outcome doesn't come entirely out of them. It isn't chess. There are some players who have a superior team and when they win they think it is because of the tactics but when they lose, what, thay are not so "experts" anymore? Luck plays a very big role here, I don't know if the results are predetermined but sometimes they are quite suspicious. I get dissapointed too when I lose, because I put some effort in this game and I want to get rewarded for that
    Peace