388Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Is it Latin? I know they used V instead of U.Originally Posted by Zeon
Is it Latin? I know they used V instead of U.
Someone explain me this: draw against him. note he has a 24-27 defence (my players range from 44 to 54)
Besides the overall mismatch in quality in your favour, I would have gone with 3-2-2-2-1 butterfly instead as that is the better formation vs his formation. but yes, you SHOULD have won. Put it down to him just having a good day with the infamous Nordeus Game Engine (NGE).Someone explain me this: draw against him. note he has a 24-27 defence (my players range from 44 to 54)
i know... i didn't have 2 wingers.... i started with a 3-1-4-2... switched to that only at the end, and guess what?? i scored. BTW 6 times i draw against similar teams this season...
are you set to attacking or normal? red arrows on wingers and defense? tactics might make a difference. try something new.
I was on normal, half pitch, normal tackles, down both flanks (red on ml mr), mixed pass when i was 3-1-4-2.... then red on two mcs (no arrows on ml and mr) and blue on striker, attack, whole pitch, mixed pass, hard tackles, down center (i scored)....
But when you have a team with 44-54 players and your opponent has 8 players from 24 to 29 and two from 35-39 you have to win...........
Last edited by CarlTaut; 04-26-2013 at 10:36 AM.
his tack ticks cancel yours
don't make me laugh.... i begun with 3-1-4-2 then i switched to that formation..... had 10 shots on targets and only one goal against that crappy team... this is the 6 time i draw against similar opponents this season
didnt say it was deserved just saying his tack tick cancels out your front 3
the funny thing is that a 3-1-4-2 down both flanks didn't do anything, then, when i changed to 3-1-3-2-1, i scored.... tactics here meaning nothing
