Loss of Moral or Loss of Logic???

[dave1311]

I agree with Bunzo. Ive had players with very poor morale get MOM and 9 rating. I pay little notice of Blues and it does not affect my results in my opinion.

[Tactician]

Read this one; you might laugh. Once I lost an important CL match, where I boosted the morale of all the players to max and with good win bonus (yes, that is one of jobs of a manager, right), and guess what? The A.M said, one of the players was not motivated enough. Another case, you go into another match with players on low morals and you win the game convincingly according to what happened during the match and A.M is full of praise in the report.

When the game has decided that your team will win, it will win no matter what (poor moral, **** formation, **** orders, poor players, poor condition, poor bonuses, red cards...) and same when you will lose (despite good moral, good bonuses, good formation, good orders, good players...).

And yes, moral go down illogically in this game, and it is clear that it is an attempt to boost income by 'fooling' users to buy tokens to exchange into packs and/or complete offers.

[Altiplano]

It's the illusion of having some control over something within the game. I know where Bunzo and dave1311 are at, I know where I'm at, I don't know where mcdoomer is at.
I got over 2500 blue packs so I don't care what they (Nordeus) have done to morale. BUT noobs and lower level players will be watching videos for blues (not greens) thinking that they need morale boosters. This in turn will have a knock on effect on the quality of players these teams have (less greens plus a f*ucked up training system) means they'll be spending more tokens to buy "instant star" players.
It's money making. Only after realising that morale is insignificant do we realise that Nordeus are busted on this one.