Top Eleven problem that make the game unfair

[PricopGeorgeCătălin]

@edisonmartins , thanks for your post, your idea is nice, I've seen it before, I asked for it before so is clearly better then what do we have but even so, even if Top Eleven would decide to add 2 teams of 120%, 2 teams of 100%, 2 teams of 80% and so on, people would still be able to manipulate their quality at the end of the season and basically we will end up exactly from the same point we left.

The only fair way would probably if we would get random opponents.

Clearly the current system is really unfair especially for those who spend money for example, their investment might be pretty much in vein if they will end up with opponents with same quality or worst, even higher quality.

[edisonmartins]

@edisonmartins , thanks for your post, your idea is nice, I've seen it before, I asked for it before so is clearly better then what do we have but even so, even if Top Eleven would decide to add 2 teams of 120%, 2 teams of 100%, 2 teams of 80% and so on, people would still be able to manipulate their quality at the end of the season and basically we will end up exactly from the same point we left.

The only fair way would probably if we would get random opponents.

Clearly the current system is really unfair especially for those who spend money for example, their investment might be pretty much in vein if they will end up with opponents with same quality or worst, even higher quality.

Hello, thinking in this situation, how would be made this manipulation and what would be the benefits?