my formation:
------------- -ST( up )-
------------ -AMC-( up )
ML( up ) - MC ( up ) - MC ( up ) - MR( up )
DL(down) - DC (down) - DC(down) - DR(down)
-GK-(down)(maybe default)
what i wanted to ask is that is this formation effective? :confused:
Printable View
my formation:
------------- -ST( up )-
------------ -AMC-( up )
ML( up ) - MC ( up ) - MC ( up ) - MR( up )
DL(down) - DC (down) - DC(down) - DR(down)
-GK-(down)(maybe default)
what i wanted to ask is that is this formation effective? :confused:
I'd say so
then which tactic is the best?
NO INDIVIDUAL TACTICS IS BEST...one formation may be effective for a specific formation,but must be a weaker for another,.. :)
Any derivative of the 4-4-2 is a solid formation that will do well MOST of the time vs the average player.
Your 4-4-1-1 is similar so should be the same as 4-4-2 for the most part.
I would prefer 4-1-4-1 myself as it is a bit more defensive but can be as effective as 4-4-2 with the right orders.
But yes, your 4-4-1-1 is sufficient for MOST games.
ok then i will stay with this formation