formation 4-4-1-1. is it good?

[Aabhash]

my formation:

------------- -ST( up )-

------------ -AMC-( up )

ML( up ) - MC ( up ) - MC ( up ) - MR( up )

DL(down) - DC (down) - DC(down) - DR(down)

-GK-(down)(maybe default)

what i wanted to ask is that is this formation effective?

[reddeviljohn]

I'd say so

[DogTag]

my formation:

------------- -ST( up )-

------------ -AMC-( up )

ML( up ) - MC ( up ) - MC ( up ) - MR( up )

DL(down) - DC (down) - DC(down) - DR(down)

-GK-(down)(maybe default)

what i wanted to ask is that is this formation effective?

the tactic is fine vs some tactics but weak vs others, there is no super tactic.
your orders are not fine(arrows etc...)

[Aabhash]

then which tactic is the best?

[Hear_break_kid]

NO INDIVIDUAL TACTICS IS BEST...one formation may be effective for a specific formation,but must be a weaker for another,..

[cracicot]

the tactic is fine vs some tactics but weak vs others, there is no super tactic.
your orders are not fine(arrows etc...)

Any derivative of the 4-4-2 is a solid formation that will do well MOST of the time vs the average player.
Your 4-4-1-1 is similar so should be the same as 4-4-2 for the most part.
I would prefer 4-1-4-1 myself as it is a bit more defensive but can be as effective as 4-4-2 with the right orders.

But yes, your 4-4-1-1 is sufficient for MOST games.

[Aabhash]

ok then i will stay with this formation