"neutral players oscilation" .... key players tend to keep high ratings, like 10-10-9-10-8 maybe, and others do this oscilation, intentionally in terms of "contribution" during the matches...Quote:
Originally Posted by Steppenwolf
Printable View
"neutral players oscilation" .... key players tend to keep high ratings, like 10-10-9-10-8 maybe, and others do this oscilation, intentionally in terms of "contribution" during the matches...Quote:
Originally Posted by Steppenwolf
Not like that... Even key players oscillate from 10 to 6 to 10... Or are completely trolled, comparing to previous season...Quote:
Originally Posted by khris
Then looking the latest scores we have to check out if the simulator has been re-calibrated lately.... cuz Im noticing that many people is saying what you say.. lately something has changed...Quote:
Originally Posted by Steppenwolf
I don't know why but developers make this game more and more disappointing. Really randomly and meanless! Khris, I see that you are looking for logic explanation for all obscenities happen in the game, but there isn't explanation and there isn't excuse for Nordeus. They killed one really good game and we have to accept this and move forward.
Nordeus never gived a explanation about Phisical & Mental attributes,and the only attribute related to the "Mental" part imo can be fitness. So Can "Fitness" be related to this player form ? Like for example, a low fitness player ( even with great stats ) is "lazy" and have rating like 8-6-6-8-7 etc.. or a player with high fitness is a hard worker and have costant rating like 8-8-9-8-9 etcQuote:
Originally Posted by khris
Also in training section we can see this
Attachment 112992
This is a example, my 2 players with different fitness
1
Attachment 112994
Attachment 112996
2
Attachment 112998
Attachment 113000
Just a hypothesis
I have noticed that lately "scouts" and players with higher gray skills are performing little better than "mutants"Quote:
Originally Posted by khris
I basically explain my knowledge and experience of how it was.... the how it is, is a mystery that we need to solve xD and yes... is true that we notice about changes in the players behavior and there are no news, but you know well as a old forumer that since years ago we've been asking for a more open relation with Nordeus... more direct, more influence from real managers (more when we talk of old managers stuck in high levels...) ...so we only can stay pushing...Quote:
Originally Posted by po_zdrach
Regarding the oscilation point I just wanted to mention that the simulation chose different players intentionally for each match, thats how it creates a variability... from the 11, 7-8 appear in the old comments (then the live animation do it's own version) and some of these 7-8 have different impact and contribution,... next match, another group of 7-8is chosen, and so...
Right now, if the ratings variation is even more wide, means that something has happenned... Im just doing observations, not justifying.
I only play the cup... Im the favourite with just one rival there...Quote:
Originally Posted by IImaestroII
Attachment 113006
Attachment 113008
I've noticed something similar. Ishi should not be performing at an equal level to Centeno.Quote:
Originally Posted by NekoIzMase
Attachment 113010Attachment 113012Attachment 113014Attachment 113016
The game is stupid and those who worry about it (including me) are even more stupid. Really, results are too random, no logic at all, so why bother? Nordeus suck but yet laugh at stupid us
