Printable View
Hello Everyone,
First of all, let me thank you for all your educating posts, I've read and learned a lot already, and for that I am thankful.
One thing that still eludes me (and please forgive me if this info is blatantly obvious, I really fail to see any correlation from any of the other calculations:
How is the "overall" / "absolute" quality calculated in a player?
EDIT: A player could be 101% (90)
the average of his two groups (he is a keeper) is 91,6 and 87,9
How do these numbers add up?
(91,6 X2) + 87,9 =271.1 /3=90.36 > 90 q
In your LV, 90q has a player 100%-6* (85q is 5*, 95q 7* ...)
101% comes if you add all the 15 skills and divide with 15.
Yes? Explain this:
Attachment 122807
how can both teams be 102% when first team has that much on attack???
Quote:
Originally Posted by nikolgiorgos
Thankyou for your response Nik (and thankyou for all the other threads you've posted that really has taught me a lot).
Great explanation.
I get the stars 1-19=1 star, 20-39=2 stars etc etc.
Do we know how the individual "overall quality" for the skill sets are calculated?
Like, in the case of the Goalkeeper below, the 91,6 in his goalkeeping skills and 87,9 in his physical/mental skills?
Attachment 122809
the connection between % and q is little complicate.
I was trying to figure out about this when the new system started, before 3 years.
https://forum.topeleven.com/tutorial...tion-list.html
Old times was more simple.
this is also complicate.Quote:
Originally Posted by funker
We don't know what factors they use to get those numbers.
11 players or 14 ?
Gen. quality or individual skills (%) or 3 categories ? How much each ?
Formation, orders affect ?
DMC is calculated in both, defence and midfield... AM players are calculated in midfield and attack... So he probably has high quality AM player(s)...Quote:
Originally Posted by funker
i don't think so... i remember when i had very good first 11, and 1* substitutes... and the quality showed by game was high, first 11 average. but how on earth is that calculated i have no idea... other time an opponent i was facing had a team perfectly balanced, 114 attack, 114 mid, 114 defence, but the average quality showed by the game was 113,1. i simply don't understand...Quote:
Originally Posted by nikolgiorgos
i know AM's and DM's are calculated both mid and def/att. but even so, the AVQ of the team should've been so much higher. 102 makes no senseQuote:
Originally Posted by Steppenwolf
Why don't you simply sum % quality of starting 11 players and then divide it with 11...Quote:
Originally Posted by funker
yes but how much a DMC contributes to deffense, midfield or attack we don't know.Quote:
Originally Posted by Steppenwolf
Also the defenders should contribute some small % in attack and I believe a DL-DC-DR line has liitle more % than 3DC.
