Have you ever thought about including leagues in which instead of having 14 teams there are 20 or more?
Printable View
Have you ever thought about including leagues in which instead of having 14 teams there are 20 or more?
season would last too long, i'd rather see better rewards for winning league
yes but this is not a priority.Quote:
This game needs changes..
Anyway, I agree with you for a six weeks season as I wrote about
https://forum.topeleven.com/top-elev...en-season.html
but not the majority
What do you think could be more important for the game to grow?
Mostly of leagues have the teams out top 4 in automatic mode, a league of 20 would have 16 inactives.... unless SL covers more spots... too longer seasons would unbalance the AvQs increasing each season the %s out of the market parameters, stucking more teams easy at 180%.... so, needs a deep study.Quote:
Originally Posted by nikolgiorgos
The first we need is well known, a recalibation of beatability margins.
First must fix some old bugs (like the subs or the penalties in asso games)
Then reduce the troll or fixed games.
Give an advantage for managers who are watching the games. Make for example the bonus active and not cosmetic and the game play must respond to the orders we have set or change. Formations and tactics should be to the great degree.
Must change the training system with a different development of skills and quality.
Tanking teams should not be able to increase quality and not playing for the CL or Cup.
CL and Cup must have teams from the same level.
Remove the top100 list and give rewards for the official competions.
Bring back negotiations and fix this madness with auctions.
In another word, make the game like it was back at 2014 when I started playing and enjoy that much. :p
I have read each one of the comments and they are very good answers and at the same time obvious for everyone.
What I do not understand is what the hell do the Top Eleven people expect?