Quote Originally Posted by Ljepoje View Post
Can you post a screener? (your vs opponent line up)

But I believe a simple 4-4-2 or 4-1-4-1 would do fine..... Otherwise go with a butterfly formation (3N-2W-2N-1-2 or 3W-1-2N-2W-2).
Versatility is the problem. Going 3N might be good facing a 3W mid and 1-1 amc st, but since his wingers were trained in DM,M and AM positions would he switch them in AMs it'd be AMR/AMC/AML + ST vs a 3 back. This opponent aside the similar quality is very tricky, and might as well be harder than the quwaitian Q 55 guy we beat in cup. He had fixed roles, but this one can morph at will. Though match.