Quote Originally Posted by Morgan O'Bree View Post
Versatility is the problem. Going 3N might be good facing a 3W mid and 1-1 amc st, but since his wingers were trained in DM,M and AM positions would he switch them in AMs it'd be AMR/AMC/AML + ST vs a 3 back. This opponent aside the similar quality is very tricky, and might as well be harder than the quwaitian Q 55 guy we beat in cup. He had fixed roles, but this one can morph at will. Though match.
Hmm, then go with the formation/line up you feel you have "best shot" with....Can't say anything else since I don't know your opposition or have any "insight" at his players.... If you feel unsecure then try to play "simple" and have a back-up ready.