I tried the 2 striker system for like 3 games and those were the worst games my team ever played
I tried the 2 striker system for like 3 games and those were the worst games my team ever played
The Warpstars - League Level 25 - Club Record: 746W - 120D - 146L
Goals Scored: 3094 Goals Against: 863
Club History
11 League Trophies: 3,4,5,7,8,9,10,17,18,19,24 | 6 Runner-Up: 2,6,11,13,16, 20
2 Cup Trophies: 5,7 | 4 Runner-Up: 10,17,19,24
0 Super League Trophies: | 0 Runner-Up:
3 Champion's League Trophies: 2,10,22 | 4 Runner-Up: 8,12,19,24
0 Triple Crowns:
What is your formation? I use mostly 451v and 442 hexagon and I scored more with the hexagon. In both formations, AMRL score more than STs, I guess that because I play down franks. If you want your st scores more goals, I think a formation with an attacking through the middle will be fine.
I have tried aml st st amr , aml amc amc amr, aml amc amr st , aml amc amc amr st , aml amc amr st st for full Seasons in my 2nd account. tbh, I can’t see any difference in performance. they all end up scoring about the same and winning/losing about the same amount.
This is actual a preferred strategy among some in this community to run AMCs over STs. There is logic to this. I have got a lot of top-notch strikers and they perform well but they never are the goal-scoring powerhouses, they just always help out. Meanwhile, my AMC, AML, and AMR are all fighting for most goals and most assists of the league. It just seems as if this game likes to make the attacking midfielders perform where strikers are on and off.
The Warpstars - League Level 25 - Club Record: 746W - 120D - 146L
Goals Scored: 3094 Goals Against: 863
Club History
11 League Trophies: 3,4,5,7,8,9,10,17,18,19,24 | 6 Runner-Up: 2,6,11,13,16, 20
2 Cup Trophies: 5,7 | 4 Runner-Up: 10,17,19,24
0 Super League Trophies: | 0 Runner-Up:
3 Champion's League Trophies: 2,10,22 | 4 Runner-Up: 8,12,19,24
0 Triple Crowns: