EXPERIMENT - Intentional PK

I would like to ask you guys, to try a test and post here your experience.
It's a well known fact that many times when we do a sub', the fresh player scores, too if we see a player missing a FK or a corner twice and we select another player for this job it's very posible to see him scoring, so, this occur because the game is so reactive.

So the idea is, that "maybe" if we switch the main PK player -when 2nd half starts, for example- the game should detect the movement, and, maybe, using some kind of orders (focuss in the middle? hard tackling if the aggressivity factor is set to benefit us and go against the oppo' etc) the game will react and select the animation showing a PK.

So, I would like to ask managers to try this, and post the result to know if there's a impact when we do this action, and then we could even try to check out the different orders that can "force a PK"

Cheers,

I changed my PK taker. Got another PK and missed again. He scores 2 late goals and I lose 2-1. Sad case of being destined to lose :(

Attachment 132156

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sillybq

I changed my PK taker. Got another PK and missed again. He scores 2 late goals and I lose 2-1. Sad case of being destined to lose :(

Attachment 132156

---

But the point is that by switchign the PK man, the engine gave you another PK... that's what the experiment wanna test :rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by khris

But the point is that by switchign the PK man, the engine gave you another PK... that's what the experiment wanna test :rolleyes:

---

Good point. I never thought of it. Will try it next time. Not often do we miss PKs so I hope I remember :)

For this case, I only switched the PK taker, did not change orders

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sillybq

Good point. I never thought of it. Will try it next time. Not often do we miss PKs so I hope I remember :)

For this case, I only switched the PK taker, did not change orders

---

you don't need to wait till you have a PK, simply, the idea is that if you, during the live match, do a change and you select another player, the engine should detect this movement, and concede a PK in your favour. Let's see.

In this case you, "maybe" and this can confirm ma theory, got a 2nd PK, cause after the 1st one you changed the player that missed the 1st, so, if my theory is right, was that action that did the 2nd PK possible.... so there's a relation...

This is a good test. I am interested to know as well. Let's see what the others experienced and hopefully we have definitive evidence that the game reacts to certain changes

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by khris

I would like to ask you guys, to try a test and post here your experience.
It's a well known fact that many times when we do a sub', the fresh player scores, too if we see a player missing a FK or a corner twice and we select another player for this job it's very posible to see him scoring, so, this occur because the game is so reactive.

So the idea is, that "maybe" if we switch the main PK player -when 2nd half starts, for example- the game should detect the movement, and, maybe, using some kind of orders (focuss in the middle? hard tackling if the aggressivity factor is set to benefit us and go against the oppo' etc) the game will react and select the animation showing a PK.

So, I would like to ask managers to try this, and post the result to know if there's a impact when we do this action, and then we could even try to check out the different orders that can "force a PK"

Cheers,

---

This sounds interesting, I will give it a shot when I am somewhat active next season. Even if I am not, I will try it during a match that I couldn’t care about.



Sent from my iPhone using by pressing the Reply button.

Changed the pk taker , 2 games after i won 2-0 , me not there , on league , with 2 p kicks from the new p kicker

Attachment 132158

Changed PK man
Opponent got PK instead but stopped.https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...671b042bcf.jpg

Sent from stupid app stop revealing my phone's name.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChocoLove

Changed PK man
Opponent got PK instead but stopped.https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...671b042bcf.jpg

Sent from stupid app stop revealing my phone's name.

---

Thats what I wanted to see... It doesnt matter if u switch a setting and then the oppo have its benefit.. this is like the Hard tackling + the aggressivity factor punishing the oppo, then is when u can force double yellows. And Im sure that this will happen more times, cause each action have a reaction for 1 or the other team, that comes from the same order u switch.... So, interesting.

another one :rolleyes:


Attachment 132201

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by milpol

another one :rolleyes:


Attachment 132201

---

So It works xD

This change in PK taker is a two-edged sword. We may get a PK when we make the change, or lose out on 1 when the engine was originally giving us 1 and somehow changed to not given because of the change.

If it is a tight game and our best attacker is performing, then we probably won’t do it;
If it is a tight game and our best attacker is not performing, say missing FKs, then we probably should do it;
If it is an easy game like 5-0 at half-time, then it could be a good idea to change the PK taker to any who has already scored 2.

But then personally I would not mess with this as every possible extra goal means an extra motm to our best attacker. Would be lovely when this works though!