I don't understand why this isn't standard? I mean, if you have a FT that you've invested many greens into, why would you corrupt him by giving him a random SA?
Now, it would still not make sense, but it'd be more understandable if we could actually TRAIN a second SA. In that case, you'd probably, to a greater extent, be willing to actually take a chance with the first random SA. If things didn't turn out as you wished, you'd just train the desired second SA. But now, it's totally illogic.
Skickat från min VOG-L29 via Tapatalk