Typical answer. I expect more from you Ljepoje. Regardless of who pays, SOMEBODY pays already, so they have an obligation to fix their issues.
I cant believe you come out with the "They dont pay so they dont have a voice" argument. It is not even a valid argument. "You get it for free so shut the **** up and stop complaining" ???(I know you didnt say this, but this is what people say) They, NORDEUS, is providing an online game that many people pay for. Therefore, there are some people who expect better service for their "donations". Donators and non-donators alike are complaining about the same things, this is a fact.
Nordeus provides a service to their customers, paying and non-paying. Everyone knows that a contract is implied with this relationship.
Thought I would throw this in for ****s and giggles:
CONTRACT 1) n. an agreement with specific terms between two or more persons or entities in which there is a promise to do something in return for a valuable benefit known as consideration. Since the law of contracts is at the heart of most business dealings, it is one of the three or four most significant areas of legal concern and can involve variations on circumstances and complexities. The existence of a contract requires finding the following factual elements: a) an offer; b) an acceptance of that offer which results in a meeting of the minds; c) a promise to perform; d) a valuable consideration (which can be a promise or payment in some form); e) a time or event when performance must be made (meet commitments); f) terms and conditions for performance, including fulfilling promises; g) performance. A unilateral contract is one in which there is a promise to pay or give other consideration in return for actual performance. (I will pay you $500 to fix my car by Thursday; the performance is fixing the car by that date). A bilateral contract is one in which a promise is exchanged for a promise. (I promise to fix your car by Thursday and you promise to pay $500 on Thursday). Contracts can be either written or oral, but oral contracts are more difficult to prove and in most jurisdictions the time to sue on the contract is shorter (such as two years for oral compared to four years for written). In some cases a contract can consist of several documents, such as a series of letters, orders, offers and counteroffers. There are a variety of types of contracts: "conditional" on an event occurring; "joint and several," in which several parties make a joint promise to perform, but each is responsible; "implied," in which the courts will determine there is a contract based on the circumstances. Parties can contract to supply all another's requirements, buy all the products made, or enter into an option to renew a contract. The variations are almost limitless. Contracts for illegal purposes are not enforceable at law. 2) v. to enter into an agreement
All this to say, when people buy tokens, they enter into a legal contract of which Nordeus has obligations to perform. Perform what you might ask. One might conclude that since one buys tokens, they have the expectation that they will outperform others who dont buy tokens. When a Tommy loses to a non-Tommy, one could actually conclude that Nordeus is not keeping up their end of the deal. Of course, this is hard to prove, but I say this to make a point = buyers and non-buyers alike, have expections on performance by Nordeus to fix issues that prevent reasonable enjoyment of their service. Everyone has this expectation and Nordeus is NOT keeping up their end of any contract.