Results 1 to 10 of 18
Like Tree3Likes

Thread: What do you think of 4-3-3 ?

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #5
    Pro
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    751
    Since your 3 midfielders are MCs (the MC/DMC is supposed to change to 4-5v-1 when needed), your team would be fine in MC area as long as those 3 MCs are placed flat in the middle. The earlier image suggested that you may have pulled 1 of those back and pushed 2 forward, hence the 4-5v-1 comparison.

    3 MCs weakness would be facing flat-4 (flank) or diamond-4 (middle) midfield formations. The solution is either having ML & MR on the bench, or starters AML & AMR have additional roles of ML & MR (AML/ML[R]), so both wingers could just move back to control midfield when needed, and then 1 MC move back & 1 MC move forward to take full control of the whole midfield for possession if needed.

    2 more separate notes:
    1) wingers aligned with ST may be better off without arrows as they could fall onto offside traps easier
    2) fullbacks may be better without up-arrows as no-arrow would allow them joining attacks, as there could be too much space on both flanks for opponent’s counter attack via wingers
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails A3-AC07-B0-63-EB-43-E8-B917-79-BA768-F8-FB3.jpg   03-D7-DA29-9-B08-4-F10-947-B-3414-CF454119.jpg  
    Winning is a form of art. Consistently winning is a show-hand of skills and luck.