Results 1 to 10 of 18
Like Tree3Likes

Thread: What do you think of 4-3-3 ?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Pro
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    751
    Since your 3 midfielders are MCs (the MC/DMC is supposed to change to 4-5v-1 when needed), your team would be fine in MC area as long as those 3 MCs are placed flat in the middle. The earlier image suggested that you may have pulled 1 of those back and pushed 2 forward, hence the 4-5v-1 comparison.

    3 MCs weakness would be facing flat-4 (flank) or diamond-4 (middle) midfield formations. The solution is either having ML & MR on the bench, or starters AML & AMR have additional roles of ML & MR (AML/ML[R]), so both wingers could just move back to control midfield when needed, and then 1 MC move back & 1 MC move forward to take full control of the whole midfield for possession if needed.

    2 more separate notes:
    1) wingers aligned with ST may be better off without arrows as they could fall onto offside traps easier
    2) fullbacks may be better without up-arrows as no-arrow would allow them joining attacks, as there could be too much space on both flanks for opponent’s counter attack via wingers
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails What do you think of 4-3-3 ?-a3-ac07-b0-63-eb-43-e8-b917-79-ba768-f8-fb3.jpg   What do you think of 4-3-3 ?-03-d7-da29-9-b08-4-f10-947-b-3414-cf454119.jpg  
    Winning is a form of art. Consistently winning is a show-hand of skills and luck.

  2. #2
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jan 2021
    Posts
    7
    Thanks for yours observations, I will to modify my formation