While i was applying for platinum associations to join, i found that alot of captains had x1 x2 so i think many players have no choice but to put up with it. Even the one you suggested to me was a x2.Quote:
Originally Posted by HeavensAAA
While i was applying for platinum associations to join, i found that alot of captains had x1 x2 so i think many players have no choice but to put up with it. Even the one you suggested to me was a x2.Quote:
Originally Posted by HeavensAAA
My impression is that the multipliers apply to the tournament results, e.g. if you (as a x3 multiplier) tie with a x1 opponent, they get 1 pt but you get 3pts. And the asso winning the matchup is determined by the sum of multiplied points.
For this week, I like it :) our asso have two x2 and four x3 teams but the opponents have all x1 but two x2.
How can you see the other semi final and what time they play??
The same way you see your own semifinal.Quote:
Originally Posted by maloukees
Yes, that’s why a lot of x3 had to choose between a better-performing asso with some x2 or even x1 and a more ‘ordinary’ asso with all x3. It is very rare that a top platinum asso has 6 full and excellent members of x3 (which means none want to leave and hence no vacancies as well ;) ) [We’d rather have one who can win with a x2 than a winless x3]Quote:
Originally Posted by Sillybq
I would have joined them again with a 3rd account, but obviously it is way too consuming already with 2. Nice asso with some very friendly teammates, though there are a few newer ones who I am not sure how good they are.
Hopefully the asso bug will have been fixed in a moment as all the earlier starters could not enter their asso matches again as a repeat of last week.
The new association format’s match times clash with other matches. Example: association match beginning three minutes before league match. The new format my be clever, but the timing of the fixtures definitely isn’t ...
No regrets but that association you recommended in in top 100 at the moment. Check them outQuote:
Originally Posted by HeavensAAA
Bugs bugs and bugs.asso finished.again no points nothing showing.and games after update impossible to play.worst update ever.totaly nordeus lost control over their system
Are they!? I know 3 of 6 are very good and at the time when I was with them with my previous club we were always way, way over 1350 every season, but then getting to top 100 is really a bit better than expected. I must have been mad in not re-joining them back earlier. Lol! ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Sillybq
Our first team asso has been doing rather well, having all won 6x consecutive 1st place finishes stretching from the season before last, and hopefully making it 7 in a row after 11 wins from 12 ties today. Second team asso, though, is struggling a bit lately. Will see how it goes...
Winners take all in the new format and it suits perfectly.
I don't know about you guys, but speaking for myself, my association did great on the first day of the new format. In fact, we are first in the world :cool:
I think it's a good idea to end the season now!:p
Attachment 137187
We have to open a Sticky thread where to track the Top 100 inside the FAs subforum...Quote:
Originally Posted by milpol
Fraud or mistake? I finished 9th in the league, but deducted 1 star. And at FA it is x1 because I became 9th. How is this? I would like an answer to mobydick@hdsnet.huQuote:
Originally Posted by Lian
Read the league rules. It is clearly stated that sometimes 9th or lower-placed teams could also be promoted to fulfil the needs of draws into a new season.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jani0608
Also read the association rules. League position in top3 gets a x3 multiplier; top4-8 gets a x2. Anything else gets a x1. Never was the promotion factor being included in the multiplier allocation as well (It is your own presumption to link these 2 together, but not suggested in any criteria as stated).
Read again if you are still confused.
Look the stars of a subs in the first teams in top 100. Guess what happen beforе the draws!
BALLERSVILLE is the same! Tell me what you do with 1 star players?
Before you start going on with our results, which are fairly won with our asso against another 2 asso in 2 rounds like everyone else, you may need to check the definition of ‘subs’ and ‘reserves’. None of our 6 teams in our asso had put any of the 1* players onto the bench as our sub (Note: subs can only be made when on the 7-men bench, not within the max 10-men reserves).Quote:
Originally Posted by hitman0013
To complete special sponsor tasks of changing role and SA every season, it is more than reasonable to keep a minimum of 6 reserve players to train on mandatory positions that the task will require (namely DC, DMC, MC, AMC & ST, if you do not know), plus another one on SA with all ideally on 49/50 to be ready when task requires completion. Is it unreasonable to both keep another 2x reserve players to be on the backup of 2 of the 5 roles on 49/50 when they get too old to train for a full 50/50 before the start of next season and for a resource-efficient manager to spend 8x 1T to possibly cover 10 seasons of role & SA tasks (instead of 2T per season plus greens to complete part of x/50)?
Let me know a more resource-efficient way in both T and money to do that 2 tasks, and I will gladly listen to your suggestion.
And for the matchup, I will also gladly share my 2 matchups in both matchdays for your references.Quote:
Originally Posted by hitman0013
Semi-final against a 4% better opposition. Won both.
Attachment 137193
Attachment 137194
Attachment 137195
Final. Same quality opposition. Won 1 Drew 1.
Attachment 137196
Attachment 137197
Attachment 137198
As clear as daylight, my matchup draws are not favourable nor unfavourable (4% is negligible). And 3 wins & 1 draw out of 4 is easily 80%+ of max possible points gained, as per my usual ratio.
So you can save your whole ‘matchup is favourable to you’ argument for another decade.
Sure, sure! Believe yourself with theory of 1 star!
As said, I would like a more resource-efficient in both T and money suggestion for the special sponsor roles & SA tasks from you, and I am still waiting....Quote:
Originally Posted by hitman0013
Move a bar forward with 25T :p Here you go!
That is not quite a ‘T and money’ resource-efficient suggestion at all, with 25T spent in just 1 season.Quote:
Originally Posted by hitman0013
It is quite clear you do not understand much about what the word ‘efficiency’ means. And so this would also be reflected in (the lack of) your squad building and improvement ratio, which would obviously impact your team’s win rate in all competitions, including the new FA.
You can keep your pipe-dream of others having a good point tally ‘just because’ they have some 1* players in their squads and can easily draw easy FA matchups to win. Cannot be bothered for any reply to any of your threads anymore when all heard are excuses-blaming (Yes, look, some other teams must have easy draws with 1* players in their teams.....no...their same-quality opposition just did not turn up....no....that team is just lucky this time.....no....the whole association always flukes......etc.......)
Aaaaaand it is quite clear you do not understand much about joke! I'm sorry buddy! One advice-learn to speak/write shorter. And dont forget that-its just a game. It often happens to all of us to forget it
Please extend the 2x tournament rewards as a gesture of goodwill to commemorate Top eleven’s 11th birthday.
It should last the entire month.
Can someone please pass this suggestion down to someone who can make it happen?
I know what you mean. It's particularly exciting this month as all of us start as equals. Lots of movement in the rankings. Not stale like it was previously. Would be great if they extended the 2x though. 1 weekend isn't gonna make 100 :(Quote:
Originally Posted by HeavensAAA
Yes, max 80T even if we make 4x 1st place finishes, which is a tall order by any means.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sillybq
Nordeus should really do the full 4 rounds with doubled rewards to make it an easier transition for associations who are still adapting to the new FA and potentially still hiring able replacements after this first round.
Very excited by the changes in 64-asso leaderboard and top-100 leaderboard. The former is a fair reflection of team effort in promotion push, and the latter is definitely a much fairer illustration of what a more ‘genuine’ top-100 table should look like. Nordeus can just add a rule of no re-joining of the same team to the same asso within 6 seasons then will completely get rid of tankers hopping on and off the same asso with the sole purpose of destroying the top-100 table with those forever-180% serial tanker teams.
Aaaannnd let the preparation for FA begin. Heavens, would you tell me what task the colleagues perform for the special sponsor. Maybe something resource-efficient?Attachment 137215Attachment 137216Attachment 137217Attachment 137218Attachment 137219
Maybe you are not like them but fact is a fact!
OO man i even played against your team in the friendlies two seasons ago. You always always supported against me. like your life depended on it.
This is my 8-men reserve list. Other managers can only view the completed role(s) &/ SA when viewing our squad, and only managers themselves can view the currently training role or SA. No other managers would know what my reserve players are training on until I post this now.Quote:
Originally Posted by hitman0013
Attachment 137220
Each of them is doing a role or SA task, except 1 who has admirably ‘finished his max quota of 2 additional roles & SA’ earlier than the rest (simply because the special sponsor task required role ‘falls’ onto him more often - something we have no control over which of the 5 possible roles the special sponsor tasks require).
And so, how do you even possibly know if and what other managers are training on which role or SA with their reserve players, before making any statements of such!? Any sensible resource-efficient manager who knows how to prepare 49/50 role or SA completion would have assigned a role or SA for any reserve players who have not achieved all roles & SA for the optimal preparation for following seasons. That is what efficiency means (and that is what you do not quite have in understanding or application, as shown repeatedly).
Every single manager can have a squad of up to 28 players. Every one of us should make the best use of this quota of 28 players to fight in all competitions, and completed tasks and events for maximum possible rewards available. This is called squad management, if you do not know.Quote:
Originally Posted by hitman0013
If we feel any particular manager is mis-using his squad (if there is such a thing at all. Hahaha!), we can always easily complain to Nordeus or even raise the issues with staff here.
As managers, it is OUR own responsibility to run an efficient squad to compete on all fronts, but not relying on other failures. Keep on moaning about how others do will NOT improve our own management at all. Learn, master and enjoy the game if you wish; or stay at current level and be overtaken by improving managers.
The last: weakest players are:
A)they are used for manipulations (their development is slowed down by acquiring roles and skills) including taking down the overall coefficient of the team - the one you can see as the stars of friendly tournaments
B)perform special tasks on Thursday evenings and Friday mornings
Please, dont answer Samuel!
Of course everyone can do what he considered for good for him as it is allowed!
It is extremely hilarious when one raises issues with another and then also demand that another not to answer.
It is like: I can say whatever I want as if everything is right, because the another cannot answer back at all (as I demand). Haha!
Patience and tolerance towards continuous provocations has its limits. So do replies with squad illustrations and earlier matchups & results as well (when someone else showed nothing but incessant baseless claims of X, Y & Z). Did my bit with solid responses already.
For the record, I am running my team in my way getting the results I want, and so do most other managers. I do not have to justify how, why and what I do with my team with anyone else, as well as asso. Winners win; losers moan. End of.
See you soon, my friend!
Semi match. 12% better than matchup. Won both, with 5-1 & 5-0.Quote:
Originally Posted by hitman0013
Attachment 137276
Attachment 137277
Attachment 137278
Final. 5.5% worse than matchup. Won both, with 5-1 & 10-1.(Yes. That is a double-digit win against a 5% better opposition in a platinum asso away match)
Attachment 137279
Attachment 137280
Attachment 137281
4 wins out of 4 this round, with at least 5 goals scored in each match and 10 (TEN!) in a final match vs 5% better. Max points plus +22 gd contributions.
Final match asso with 2 same-quality matchups, with 2 against 5% better oppositions and another 2 with 15% better oppositions. And yet our asso still won.
Attachment 137282
Attachment 137283
Attachment 137284
Another 120 points to be added when 3rd/4th-fight matches are done. Still will be leading by a good margin after 2 full rounds.
Attachment 137285
So...I guess your verdict will again be:
‘Yes, he is lucky to draw with easy matchups with easy matches’,
‘His asso is again flukes some wins against a better-rated asso (when 1* players presence suppose to draw worse-rated asso, not better, according to some unknown logic)’
‘He is just lucky with his team scoring lots of fortunate goals’
As always, facts and results (illustrating ability to win) speaks louder than excuses. :)
No more words mr. "special sponsor task". Attachment 137286Attachment 137287
Stop pretending to be an angel!
And the FA draws this season are fixed. So no need to put these litle stars in start-up.
Since last 1 year our all matches have been against +10 to +20 associations and yet we reached Top 100. This season I have faced +30, +20, +20 and a +20.
We all know how these glorious records are made. 1 loss till Level 7 is a proof that someone has never manipulated.
I'm thinking of finishing! I have no more nerves, besides, i think I'm wasting my time!
So to your theory, we must never place any reserve players into first-11. Not for draws, not for friendlies, not for firestarter event, etc. Reserves must always sit in reserves no matter when, is it?Quote:
Originally Posted by hitman0013
Can you explain how:
1) our asso got drawn with a 6% overall better-rated asso (if 1* player draw strategy would always work, according to you)?
2) our asso could win against that asso with the final score of 60 vs 40?
3) I could get all 4 wins, with 2 of those 5-1 & 10-1 wins against a 5% better opposition then?
And my reserves are specifically bought and trained for special sponsor tasks - or else all 8 of them should already have completed all 3 roles & SA already for the lowest possible rating (not 7 of 8 players still have 49/50 waiting for task completions), for even ‘easier’ draws as you would assume so.
And there are only 2 groups: winners for prize and losers moan.
Unfortunately, in TE, there are no prizes of heaven for angels and hell for devils here.
Not that any manager would win any recognition for being a devil or angel, even when these statuses are non-existent in TE. ;)
If so, every single freeloader manager, let alone paying manager who have way more resources, should also have my record, or even better, when they manipulate.Quote:
Originally Posted by Siddharth Singh
Plus even better platinum association records too.
Please provide a similar record of a level 5-10 club in both club records and association winning records as comparison. I will take your point when you do.
Dude I am on your side. We all know how these records are made. These records aren't possible unless one is a Legendary level manager.Quote:
Originally Posted by HeavensAAA
There are so many manipulators in this game and yet none have such a record.
