short passing & players positions

[El Pistolero]

I tested mixed passing with the narrow diamond and lost with my subs as I've already won the league. 80% passing accuracy, could of been higher, tbh.

[cracicot]

I tested mixed passing with the narrow diamond and lost with my subs as I've already won the league. 80% passing accuracy, could of been higher, tbh.

could have been higher had you been using your top 11. not a fair stab at it, dont you think? If passing accuracy was the stat that told you that this theory works, wouldnt you use your best players to make sure that you have a baseline and THEN test with several other things.

[El Pistolero]

could have been higher had you been using your top 11. not a fair stab at it, dont you think? If passing accuracy was the stat that told you that this theory works, wouldnt you use your best players to make sure that you have a baseline and THEN test with several other things.

Yeah but there was only one 4 star, the rest were 5 stars and 1 6 star. I still had more quality than my opponent.

[shwanko07]

Yeah but there was only one 4 star, the rest were 5 stars and 1 6 star. I still had more quality than my opponent.

man .. when i test .. i care less about team quality .. i play one half with with short and another with mix .. so let us see if passing, possession and shoots increase or reduce is easy to spot the difference ..
now only 2 variables can effect the result of that test. which is team stamina and some randomized factor
so to be sure i try it another game but inverse it to mix at first half and short at 2nd just to be sure stamina was not an issue

[shwanko07]

I tested mixed passing with the narrow diamond and lost with my subs as I've already won the league. 80% passing accuracy, could of been higher, tbh.

how was it with short passing only? better?