What is the point of (investing) in young players ?

[influenze]

that is an easy example and a obvious one , and its correct

but what about a 18 years old 30 quality value 4.5 million vs a 18 years old 29 quality and 4.36 million vs a 18 years old
26 quality costing 3.95 million ? who you believe is the best of these 3 ?

Looks like all 3 will train equally (fast trainers with that market value), i would go for the player with 29 or 30 quality but first i would take a look at the profile: can they play with both legs, special ability...

[xempen]

Looks like all 3 will train equally (fast trainers with that market value), i would go for the player with 29 or 30 quality but first i would take a look at the profile: can they play with both legs, special ability...

well actually the 3d one train faster than the other too and eventually he will be better than the first and second

[influenze]

well actually the 3d one train faster than the other too and eventually he will be better than the first and second

Are you sure, when i was in that level 4,36 million for 18y old with 29 quality was the best i could find.

[xempen]

Are you sure, when i was in that level 4,36 million for 18y old with 29 quality was the best i could find.

i said between these 3 not generally between all the 18 years old that exist (and im level 3 best ive seen so far is 1 34 quality 4 million )

[xempen]

but i think fast training is kinda a myth and much theory , as i told in previous reply i noticed some players train better in defferent kind of training like : a 18 years old train in normal practice for 60 % and in hard 90 %

need many test to run for accuracy