asymetrical formations

[Accyrover]

The above are not really Asymmetrical as such (they are what I call lob sided) and in the case you have above a DMC placed centrally would pick up that AM player.
A standard generic formation as the V would be fine.
Asymmetrical formations need balance to work those do not. IMO Focusing attack on the opposite side to your stronger defensive side is, well! ......... short of players, and that's being kind.

[johnson bleckman]

I

The above are not really Asymmetrical as such (they are what I call lob sided) and in the case you have above a DMC placed centrally would pick up that AM player.
A standard generic formation as the V would be fine.
Asymmetrical formations need balance to work those do not. IMO Focusing attack on the opposite side to your stronger defensive side is, well! ......... short of players, and that's being kind.

I agree. this is not really very assymetrical. i used to play a normal MR with an AML which worked well. However very assymmetrical formations seem to be at a disadvantage although IMO more so on the defensive side than offense. If the other side is assymmetrical in attack I might move the better DC to that side etc. If a defense is assymmetric it might be a good idea to attack that weakness. I am still trying to gather info. Anyone with any data?