Page 39 of 91 FirstFirst ... 2937383940414989 ... LastLast
Results 381 to 390 of 908
Like Tree230Likes

Thread: Table of Counter Formations v2.0 - Which formation to use?

  1. #381
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    7
    Orders for my 4-4-1-1 ?? Help plz

  2. #382
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    3

    New Formations I spotted !!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by Saransh Vatsa View Post
    Good it is updated.....
    It's really helpful this table RESPECT for the creator,but I recently start seeing formations kinda 2-1-4-1-2 and similar ...

    Anyone knows anything ?? Thanks in advance!!! Peace...

  3. #383
    Addicted Chris Rath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    735
    Quote Originally Posted by Konstantin Stoyanov View Post
    It's really helpful this table RESPECT for the creator,but I recently start seeing formations kinda 2-1-4-1-2 and similar ...

    Anyone knows anything ?? Thanks in advance!!! Peace...
    That are illegal formations. You can play them, but the opponent will get a possesion bonus. A legal formation must contain at least 3 defenders, one striker, one player on each wings, but at most two on one side, ...
    t11_fan likes this.



    Founded: January, 16th 2013
    League level: 20
    "We are no cup team, we are a pub team"

    - FCK stories from time to time, when I look around. -

  4. #384
    Newbie ulmis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    10
    In one game my striker broke his leg and I replaced him with AMC playing one row lower. I did not notice any possession penalty during that game...

  5. #385
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    10
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris Rath View Post
    That are illegal formations. You can play them, but the opponent will get a possesion bonus. A legal formation must contain at least 3 defenders, one striker, one player on each wings, but at most two on one side, ...
    You should had checked that before saying stuff like it
    In this season, even if there is a penalty for those formations, it would be minimal one. At least for not having 3 defenders or not having wing players at all. I've seen too many matches with those formations, and maybe they get ~5% penalty, but that is nothing compared to old 20/80 penalty

  6. #386
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris Rath View Post
    That are illegal formations. You can play them, but the opponent will get a possesion bonus. A legal formation must contain at least 3 defenders, one striker, one player on each wings, but at most two on one side, ...
    Illegal ??? .... whateva it is I'm planning using 4-5-1V style.!! Do you think I have chance to win ??

  7. #387
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    12
    Quote Originally Posted by Promit Sarjine View Post
    But will my 3 defenders manage to handle his strikers? I am not sure about the 3-1-4-2 and playing with 3 dc's
    Meh.

    3-5-2 or 3-4-3 is a legit formation. But I always use 3dc (narrow) never felt like that I lost because my team has only 3 Def players.


    Or use 5-3-2 and tag/mark dl and dr with red arrow

    But in my experience you won't have any luck with a new formation immediately. You have to let your team play a few matches until they get good and better. I always lost my first matches after i drastically changed formations.

    No matter which.

    From 4-3-3 to 4-4-2 or 3-4-3 to 5-3-2 I always lost hard the first matches

    Plus, I never place wrong positions. Always use correct ones (mc on mc/ mr on mr etc) . Bear that in mind.
    Last edited by dekatch; 11-01-2014 at 06:43 PM.

  8. #388
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    6
    Hello guys, im new here, season is almost over and im currently on 2nd place with 55 points, 1 place has 56 points, and i play against him in 2 days, so that game will decide everything, so i need help how to beat him, he uses formation 4-1(DMC)-3W(LM-CM-RM)-1(AMC)-1, his AMC MC and ST are his best players! thx

  9. #389
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    12
    According to the original post its

    5-1(dmc) -2(n) -2

    It's a 5-3-2 formation




    Edit, can't you guys read?
    Last edited by dekatch; 11-12-2014 at 08:22 AM.

  10. #390
    Wiki Contributor Incredipede's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Mount Everest
    Posts
    653
    I don't really see a point in updating this. It has the most used formations.


Page 39 of 91 FirstFirst ... 2937383940414989 ... LastLast