Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: question

  1. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Cairo - Egypt
    Posts
    693
    Quote Originally Posted by namir9 View Post
    is it 3W or 3N ?
    im having a hard time against 4-1-4-1
    sorry for being late
    but i see there is no difference 3n ok and 3w ok.

  2. #12
    Rookie ZSKovac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Valjevo, Serbia
    Posts
    104
    Quote Originally Posted by Ming FC View Post
    what about my formation 4-3-2-1
    Your formation is legal, I use this formation very often myself.

  3. #13
    Newbie Ming FC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    15
    haha, yeah, i use this to fight against 3-1-3-1-2 / 4-3-3 ... until now, never lose before

  4. #14
    Famous fmldotcom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,026
    Quote Originally Posted by Adel Gamal View Post
    If he is using an AMC then you must use DMC and vice verse ..

    if he plays with 4 1 4 1 then use 3 1 4 2 this formation will work great with you.
    MUST is complication on the idea itself. It all depends on the style of play your opponent and yours as well. If he plays short passing then DMC is needed because the AMC operates in the hole to stretch your midfield and pull your defense out of position. If the opponent uses flanks and long balls the AMC acts as a 2nd ST thus DMC is not a MUST. The same applies when your opponent uses a DMC you don't always need to avoid him and go to flanks as the opponent can put blue arrow on his DMC and he will drop deep to defend as an anchorman. If your opponent uses a DMC and you are sticking to your normal formation and tactics going through the middle an AMC will be more benefitcial than an MC with red arrows because putting an AMC in there will make sure his DMC stays back marking giving your MC's more space and time on the ball.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12