It's mean that they will be more active in defence but at the same time, they won't be so active in attack :)Quote:
Originally Posted by SenSher0
Printable View
It's mean that they will be more active in defence but at the same time, they won't be so active in attack :)Quote:
Originally Posted by SenSher0
Hi pricop.! How to you will orders if your formation is 4-5-1 v style & 4-4-2 classic ? (about arrows & tactics)
can you guide to me?
Thanks you
(sorry about my english skill,i hope you understand)
Do you usually put blue arrows on your defenders or goalkeeper, and red on your striker, to good effect? There are some that say if you put a red arrow on a DL, he will play as a DML when you attack, so lately I haven't been putting blue arrows on my defenders and goalkeeper, and no red arrows on my strikers, and I'm getting pretty good results.Quote:
Originally Posted by PricopGeorgeCătălin
IMO, I think arrows should be used for less productiv and weak players(low quality) but now depend.Quote:
Originally Posted by Potemy
On 4-4-2, you can use blue on defenders and red on midfielders or strikers.Quote:
Originally Posted by wanboo237
On 4-5-1 v style, I played with blue on def and red on rest + DMC
You didn't really answer my question, though. I just want to know whether it's okay to put red arrows on your strikers, and blue on your defenders and goalkeepers. My understanding of arrows used to be that players moved in the direction of the arrows when attacking or defending, so there's really nowhere for the goalkeeper and defenders to go on defence, nor the striker on attack.Quote:
Originally Posted by PricopGeorgeCătălin
Hello all
On 30th of november you wrote something about the formation, and upload this picture
Attachment 525
And then, if I read it ok, u said u changed the formation, thats true?
why? only for fun? xD
the formation in the picture is not good anymore?
(sry for my English)
I've been experimenting a little with arrows.
First defenders.
Previously only ever put down arrows on the centre DC of three, to act as a sweeper against two strikers, or up arrows on DL/DR when playing the V formation.
For the last few days I've put them on all three, with different mentality settings and counter options.
When used with defensive mentality no counter they definitely do not venture to far up field, which is what you want.
In attacking mentality with off side on they moved forward but seem to drop to deep when out of possession, my MF and DM's seem to be doing far more tackling which IMO accounted for 4 bookings in two games.
In normal with no off side and no counter they were all over the place scoring from open play.
So while I'm still not 100% that arrows do a great deal I will persist wit the trials, the same goes for AM's and ST I'm not convinced they do a great deal.
My reasoning is that you cannot rely on the game engine to be giving a true picture of where players are and what they are actually doing.
There's is only one constant on Tll, inconsistency! there lies the problem, utter confusion. :confused:
Hey, i'm new at this game, but played a Kind of simular game before(hattrick) are The game working allmost In The same way?
And does i loose to mutch midtfield if i play 2 dmc instead of cm players?
Last question: how mutch skill will a player loose if he is LM and i use him at cm instead?
Realy hope for som fast answer, cs i'm i. The semi final of The cup and i'm dont Get all yet.
Thanks, In front ;)
Nesttun
Hello,
It's my formation :
DL - DC - DC - DR
MC - MC - MC
AMC
ST-ST
it's illégal formation ?
If i put ML-MC-MR ? it's better ?
(sorry for my english)
It's not illegal, no problems at all with that formation as it has DL/DR which are flank players.
thanksQuote:
Originally Posted by Accyrover
so what do you see??Quote:
Originally Posted by Accyrover
What he wanted to say is that, not stars are everything, a player with 52/55 can be better then a 6 stars or to have more points on he's field possition, etc.Quote:
Originally Posted by rastadrumma
Trust me, I have 6 stars, on subs, and I'm playing with 5 stars just because they play much better.
well, that case you have already seen him play.. what if you haven't? i mean like when you want to buy some player in transfer list, what would you take as a consideration to pick a certain player?Quote:
Originally Posted by PricopGeorgeCătălin
Like I said, first I look on quality ofcourse I'm aiming for players who will go sooner to 6 stars, is normal and if you have some tokens, you should do same.Quote:
Originally Posted by rastadrumma
On what I look: 1. General Quality 2. Stats 3. Statistics 4. Ages 5. Competition
i see.. thank you..Quote:
Originally Posted by PricopGeorgeCătălin
i have another question, i've never used arrow before i read your tips on this forum and my 2 6* ST and 2 5*ST was never scored in last 3 games(before use arrow)..but now i think they are doing great with the formation which i set myself with the arrow thing and im quite satisfy of that..
the problem is, i put 1 5*ST and 1 6*ST when i started to use the arrow thing and i havnt tried to put both 6*ST with arrow.
so, my 1st question is should i keep that formation till the end of season?
2. should i replace the 5*ST with the 6*ST(subs)?
3. they're all talking about upgrading DF,MF,ST skills..but no one talk about GK skills..so any tips for GK skills?
I have few 6 stars on subs too, if you see your team is playing very good like that, keep this formation, no reason to change it.
Look on stats to see who have a better report on games/goals
About gk, I never used arrows on them and skill points all on defence (IMO).
Thank you Pricop.. appriciate it..
its really helpful..
im only lvl 1 btw..
cheerz
ok.. my opponent will use kinda wierd formation
DR-DC-DC-DL
DMR
MC-MC-MC
AMR-AML
i'll use
DR-DC-DC-DL
ML-MC-MC
AMR
ST-ST
and i hav a better quality players then him at all position..so what do you think? should i play 3-3-1-3?
You are welcome!Quote:
Originally Posted by rastadrumma
Quote:
Originally Posted by rastadrumma
You should keep main formation :)
Attachment 622
could u tell how to beat this illegal formation?
......................DC..............
...........DMC...DMC...DMC....
............MC......MC..............
.....AMR.................AMC......
.............ST............ST........
Hello, you don't need any tactic, use some ofensive mentality because you will have 80% ball possesion and it will help you to create more chances, also use win bonus. Let me know result tomorrow.Quote:
Originally Posted by VishalFC
Thanx Pricop, my team won 4-2...Quote:
Originally Posted by PricopGeorgeCătălin
Ok guys, in my league there is a very normal team with no 5 stars players that uses a very weird tactic which I have never seen before..and he manages to win pretty often also against much stronger team..I faced him a couple of days ago and even if i played home and i am much stronger after 30 minutes the result was already 0-3 for him..this goes way beyond pure random...his tactic is the following:
......................GK..............
.....DR............DC........DL....
....DMR..........DMC......DML..............
..............MC...MC....MC..........
......................ST...................
Today he played against the strongest team in the league, after 25 minutes he got is DMC injured and didn´t replace him, so he played 65 minutes 10 vs. 11 with basically no defence...and he won...
Could it be that somehow this weird formation is the key to the top eleven match engine?it can not be pure luck all the time..
I have played with GK injuried and i won with 4-0 ;) Look!
Attachment 721
I'm happy to hear that!Quote:
Originally Posted by VishalFC
Thats nice, but your team is much, much better then he's :PQuote:
Originally Posted by topfriend
Yes, it is. He have a DC as GK and a GK as ST :cool:
PS: Nice signature Catalin :)
Hello, just started playing 2 days ago. I've been reading your advice and buying decent players. Could you look at this team and see if my tactics are ok? Is it just a case of putting your players into their favourite positions?
Attachment 912
Questions:
Do I need to have a DM?
What players should I sell/buy?
Does it make a difference having a player in the middle square instead of one of the squares either side of the middle one? E.g. xx-xx or x-xxx ?
Thanks! Your advice has been great.
You don't need to have them strategic like xx-xx, they can be x-xxx as well, also you made a nice formation with your players, is really ok, you should sell your res.
its way too aggressive imho, unless you have a squad rivalling brazil, i wouldnt play that formation. you want to be playing 4 layers, such as 4-2-3-1, or 4-4-1-1, or if you have really good CBs 3-5-2, or even 3-3-2-2
No is not, because he just started to play so it's mean that he's level 1 and you can see he have very good players on defence.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapyer
Thanks for the advice. I did think it was too attacking. To switch to 4-2-3-1 I just need to move one striker down into central AMF position right? (See my last pic).
Can I play an MF or ST there? or does it have to be an AMF?
Do you ever use DMFs? Or put players in that line?
Cheers
What do you mean four layers? I think the formation is okay, but the arrows are all wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapyer
Rob, it's best to not play players out of position.
Honestly your team is very good how is now, especially at your level. Don't make more changes.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob1984
I read your tutorial and I must say, it's very well written and so helpful. Thanks a lot George!
You are welcome :)Quote:
Originally Posted by mcd
Any help to win against this formation:
------------GK-----------
--------DC-DC-DC-------
DML---------------DMR-
------------MC----------
AML---------------AMR-
--------ST----ST-------
He is strongest than me
Thanks. .
