Formation for my New team

[Bommelinho]

Okay i can play 3-1-5-1 but with which tactic? this is not two much in the middle, i have a strong second ST and a strong AMC

And i have now some questions for the formation,too.

So i have some ideas for a formation:

1.)

3-1-4-1-1

GK (down)
DC (down), DC (down), DC (down)
DMC (normal)
MR (UP) MC, MC, ML (UP)
AMC (UP)
ST (UP)

tactic: ???

2.)

3-1-5-1

GK (down)
DC (down), DC (down), DC (down)
DMC (normal)
MR (UP) MC, MC (UP), MC, ML (UP)
ST (UP)

tactic: ???

3.)

3-1-4-1-2

GK (down)
DC (down), DC (down), DC (down)
DMC (normal)
MR (UP), MC, MC, ML (UP)
AMC (UP)
ST (UP)

tactic: ???

4.)

i must buy a DL

and so than i can play with 4 defense player but this is to much i think.

is it better to play with 3 or 4 defense player at the end?

[Accyrover]

Okay i can play 3-1-5-1 but with which tactic? this is not two much in the middle, i have a strong second ST and a strong AMC

And i have now some questions for the formation,too.

So i have some ideas for a formation:

1.)

3-1-4-1-1

GK (down)
DC (down), DC (down), DC (down)
DMC (normal)
MR (UP) MC, MC, ML (UP)
AMC (UP)
ST (UP)

tactic: ???

2.)

3-1-5-1

GK (down)
DC (down), DC (down), DC (down)
DMC (normal)
MR (UP) MC, MC (UP), MC, ML (UP)
ST (UP)

tactic: ???

3.)

3-1-4-1-2

GK (down)
DC (down), DC (down), DC (down)
DMC (normal)
MR (UP), MC, MC, ML (UP)
AMC (UP)
ST (UP)

tactic: ???

4.)

i must buy a DL

and so than i can play with 4 defense player but this is to much i think.

is it better to play with 3 or 4 defense player at the end?

Read section 4 and 5 in this link. http://forum.topeleven.com/tutorials...-part-1-a.html
Then rethink what you are trying to achieve with all those arrows.
In most cases they are not needed as you would use one of the 'mentality modes' to give the same effect.
Putting down arrows on a GK would be crazy, he would not move off his line, IMO, which would mean he would not narrow angles against one on one strikers he would not come for crosses.