Help! Against 4-3-3-0! A formation without ST????

[Max]

I had a match with a guy using 4-3-3 formation. His squad was weaker than mine, but the interesting thing is he used a squad without ST.

DL - DC - DC - DR
ML - MC - MC
AML - AMC - AMR

At first I thought: "well it's gonna go easy". I chose 3-1-2-3-1 formation, with intention to control and pressing the midfield.
And then, he gave me a draw match 1-1
Did I do something wrong?

Well, I am not the best with formations but I will do my best.

You see, players without an ST can do equally as well as players with them, the ST is not the most important role in my opinion, ST’s are more of a supportive role to your wingers but AMC’s do a similar job as well.

So by the looks of it, this is the formation you play right?



Ok, if so, I will show you the weakness, sorry if this looks confusing to you but I will explain it to you, the arrows are showing that your flanks are weak, the space can be exploited by the opponent’s AML/AMR. The Circle’s there show that you have no DL/DR, these could help you fend off the opponent’s wingers. So the AML/AMR could have exploited your flanks.

One good thing is you have a dmc and your opponent does not.



Your opponent has three players, in midfield, the 2 mc’s and the ml, whereas you have two midfield players so you are out numbered.



That is it really. I think it should help. That is where I think you went wrong.


Sent from my iPhone using by pressing the Reply button.

[jacks109cao]

Well, i'm sorry for not telling it clearly. I mean I didn't play with 3 DCs.
I used 3W-1-2-3W-1:

DL - - DC - - DR
- DMC -
- CM - CM -
AML - AMC - AMR
- ST -

[Max]

Well, i'm sorry for not telling it clearly. I mean I didn't play with 3 DCs.
I used 3W-1-2-3W-1:

DL - - DC - - DR
- DMC -
- CM - CM -
AML - AMC - AMR
- ST -

Sorry, I wouldn’t be so sure anymore, I can’t pinpoint a problem with that one exactly, the first formation that was the wrong one you gave me by mistake had weaknesses, I honestly can’t pinpoint a problem with it.

I am thinking I would get it wrong with this one.


He has 3 midfield players and you have two so maybe he had better use of possession, this may be wrong.

The first formation you mentioned had obvious cracks, I cannot find any with the one you actually use.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk