Conditions for winning association matches

[Kundan Bhoi]

It was written somewhere in this forum that association matches purely depends on team stars/quality, but not manager level.
Or did i missed something?

Because my 2 association team members 5* lost to 4* opponents that too in home matches.
Even i too lost both matches ( my 4* team was better in papers then the other 4* opponent in quality level 67.3 vs 58.9)
My team - 2 players 5* and others 4*
opponent - 1 player 5* , 3 players 4 * and others 3 *

Is not this like daylight robbery ?

[LeManiaque]

This seems pretty reasonable...
Maybe they had better sharing of bonuses or strategy, or better balanced teams. 67 vs 59 - how close do you think teams should have to be for an upset?

[khris]

It was written somewhere in this forum that association matches purely depends on team stars/quality, but not manager level.
Or did i missed something?

Because my 2 association team members 5* lost to 4* opponents that too in home matches.
Even i too lost both matches ( my 4* team was better in papers then the other 4* opponent in quality level 67.3 vs 58.9)
My team - 2 players 5* and others 4*
opponent - 1 player 5* , 3 players 4 * and others 3 *

Is not this like daylight robbery ?

No, in absolute. Thats a close match.

A 4* can do a better contribution than a 7* perfectly, remember that, there are the visual skills and the internal programming, that determines, how % of effectiveness have a player, in shoots, free kicks, corners etc, too how % of contribution/appearances/ lets say time visible is during the matches, etc.

So, basically is a x9 4* formation vs x3 4* + x7 3*

Some people come here and have the same idea, but thats a wrong perspective regarding how the stars differance really make the differance.
Believe me, this is a close match and what make the differance, is the internal %'s of effectivity and contribution/appearances during the match.

Too we have to see, the economic bonus, the normal training bonus, the actions inside the match as sub's, + the bonus possesion for who attends....

Is much more bigger what have influence really and, for those who come to complain, the margin in stars terms that a level can face another team equally is more much big.

[Kundan Bhoi]

ok i was able to understand some part.

I had received a good team bonus before match through training. attack/defence/posession/condition were at 4%

even today my team played draw with 3*(53%) team in away and won in a rare margin in home game (1:0)

i do not face these problems in league/CH league/ cup. Only in association match.

[Darren Power]

i have two teams,hence two associations,my A(bronze 1) team does okay but my lower team (4/5*) and that group is currently ranked number (bronze2)1 but i only played with 4 players but all members attended games,adding a fifth last week but my main point,that i think sways games is and i think its obvious,that managers attend the games,both my associations do much better when all members attend,personally its why i think my B teams one has been more potent than my A one with 5/6* teams