I found a f!@king table

[Liquid]

Um...you guys posted the rules but nobody is citing rule "a".

If two or more teams are equal on points on completion of the group matches, the following criteria are applied to determine the rankings (in descending order):
a) higher number of points obtained in the group matches played among the teams in question;


Points obtained between the teams in question. That's a Nordeus way of saying "who beat who?" Basically, when you went head to head with him in those two matches he earned more points from you than you earned from him. What was your record against him? Did he beat you one game and tie the other? Or maybe he beat you twice?

[Buffs Mad]

Um...you guys posted the rules but nobody is citing rule "a".

If two or more teams are equal on points on completion of the group matches, the following criteria are applied to determine the rankings (in descending order):
a) higher number of points obtained in the group matches played among the teams in question;


Points obtained between the teams in question. That's a Nordeus way of saying "who beat who?" Basically, when you went head to head with him in those two matches he earned more points from you than you earned from him. What was your record against him? Did he beat you one game and tie the other? Or maybe he beat you twice?

The OP was given the rules including that one and asked to post back if the outcome seemed unexpected.

The only person that came back with a question after the rules were posted actually said that the head to head record was 2 draws - so points were equal and thats why we went to the next criteria and beyond.