International CUP Qualification error

[azspti]

Hi,

as per standing table below Pakistan should have qualified, based on equal goals and more goals being away. Pakistan beat Uzbekistan at their home and still being 3rd on the standing. To me it seems incorrect.



If we see more away wins and goals for Pakistan than Uzbekistan.

Can anyone explain this?

thanks.

[khris]

Hi,

as per standing table below Pakistan should have qualified, based on equal goals and more goals being away. Pakistan beat Uzbekistan at their home and still being 3rd on the standing. To me it seems incorrect.



If we see more away wins and goals for Pakistan than Uzbekistan.

Can anyone explain this?

thanks.

You should discount from the top 3 the matches vs Spain... and if u count the points and goals again, you have to be 3rd for that reason

[khris]

Iran 3points 2-3 gf gc
Uzbekistan 3 points 3-2 gf gc
Pakistan 3 points 2-2 gf gc

so yes, is wrong, u shuld be 2nd and Iran out.

[azspti]

how can it be corrected?

[khris]

how can it be corrected?

"?" button inside the game, in the left corner below, you can send a ticket to the support, too in the bugs section the link to the form is sticky in a thread to contact.

[azspti]

game is finished, i checked the table after, now I cannot click the ? button

[khris]

game is finished, i checked the table after, now I cannot click the ? button

Use da forum link

https://forum.topeleven.com/bugs-tec...hift-form.html

[nikolgiorgos]

0 points for Spain vs
Pakistan
Uzbekistan
Iran


That's a bug anyway

[TropikThunder]

​

You should discount from the top 3 the matches vs Spain... and if u count the points and goals again, you have to be 3rd for that reason

Where does it say that is the tiebreaker method? In one of the IC threads, one of the admins answered a question about tiebreakers by saying it is the same rules as for CL/SL but there's no such thing as "away goals" in the IC since all the games were played on a neutral venue.

According to the FIFA World Cup rules, the group stage tiebreakers are:

Among Iran, Uzbekistan, and Pakistan:
1. Points in all games [all three teams had 6 points]
2. Goal difference in all games [all three teams had +2]
3. Goals scored in all games [Iran had 6 goals for so get first place]
---------------
Now go back and do just Uzbekistan and Pakistan:
1. Points in all games [both had 6 points]
2. Goal difference in all games [both had +2]
3. Goals scored in all games [both had 4 goals for]
4. Head-to-head points {Pakistan won 2-0 so Pakistan gets 2nd]

So Pakistan are supposed to be 2nd but because they beat Uzbekistan, not because you ignore the results vs Spain. I'll try to find the admin post where they talk about the tiebreaker.

Edit: I am wrong, khris is right, see below.

[TropikThunder]

Found it (khris you are correct about removing Spain results but goal difference is first):

Just asking, what is the tie-break criteria for the IC? Is it by GD or is it head-to-head like CL?

Hey pnr. It's same rules as CL/SL.

So Sausy says the tiebreak is the same as CL/SL but like I said no away goals in IC:

https://nordeus.helpshift.com/a/top-...r-league-group

1. Highest number of points. [all had 6]
2. The best goal difference from the group matches played between teams level on points. [remove Spain results and Uzbekistan is +1, Pakistan is level, and Iran is -1]
3. The highest number of goals scored between teams that are level.
4. The highest number of goals scored away from home between the teams that are level.
5. If two teams are still level after applying steps 1-4, repeat the steps and apply the above criteria exclusively to the two teams concerned. If the two teams still remain level, criteria 6 and 7 should be applied.
6. The best goal difference from all group matches played.
7. Highest number of goals scored from all group matches played.