Collecting data, playing friendlies and getting great dominance and contributive stats just means the opponent’s ratios/stats are higher than ours when you lose. Asking us to spend resources for no real increase in knowledge. Its bs if you ask me. I told your student raiko my league opponent was better trained and he tells me all other kinds of explanations why i lost......my opponent simply had 300 whites and 1 percent greys and won despite being lower quality. Advising others without listening/reading
Precisely why I don’t think too much of all these things being mentioned. Team chemistry, nerfed ratings and all these parameters just point towards, losses can be expected no matter how good your team is and the cause cannot be determined or defined easily. Whats the difference? We cant pinpoint which parameters will be used for any particular match. Simply put is dont blame the engine or system when you lose, the fault is yours.
I want to be educated by successful players who can achieve success with as little as possible. I need to see a proven track record. Not players who have been playing really long but are on break half their career. Thanks but no thanks. We should agree to disagree.