How to beat this???

[sephox]

would be happy for any tipps

[Der Panzer]

I think that's illegal formation. You can go with standard formation like 4-4-2, 4-5-1, etc #CMIIW

[sephox]

hmmm last game he played gaianst 4-1-2-1-2 Narrow Diamond and won 5:0

so should i play 4-5-1 v style? its the cl final, so important

[Der Panzer]

hmmm last game he played gaianst 4-1-2-1-2 Narrow Diamond and won 5:0

so should i play 4-5-1 v style? its the cl final, so important

with that formation? It makes no sense unless his opponent at that time was abandon team. but how about their statistic ? how about possesion? can you give me picture for that match?

[fadhul17]

Sometimes dis game not make sense

[Der Panzer]

here is just a proof that that formation's illegal


You just can go with standard formation, and with right order. You may play attacking but dont go too attacking
I suggest you go with 4-5-1 V

[sephox]

here you go:



i mean the opponent got a red card, but still...

[Flinger]

Why should it be illegal?
Has 3 defenders, 2 players in each wing, has a ST and has 5 players on attacking side of the pitch... Only reason for being illegal is players out of position.
That said, i'd probably go with a 451 (more a 4 3 2 1) or a 442, attacking down the flanks.

It really depends on the orders he sets, so it's a wild guess.

A weird ideia is going for an asymmetric formation yourself. Like:
-----ST-ST
---------------AMR
ML MC MC MC
---------------DMR
---DC-DC-DC

No idea if this would work

[Der Panzer]

here you go:

Clearly any different between his last formation with the new one. In his recent formation, he's using AMC instead of MC and that why its illegal and this an advantages for you

[Der Panzer]

Why should it be illegal?
Has 3 defenders, 2 players in each wing, has a ST and has 5 players on attacking side of the pitch... Only reason for being illegal is players out of position.
That said, i'd probably go with a 451 (more a 4 3 2 1) or a 442, attacking down the flanks.

It really depends on the orders he sets, so it's a wild guess.

A weird ideia is going for an asymmetric formation yourself. Like:
-----ST-ST
---------------AMR
ML MC MC MC
---------------DMR
---DC-DC-DC

No idea if this would work

Make a try and you'll find it