View Poll Results: Should this thread be sticky?

Voters
14. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    12 85.71%
  • No

    2 14.29%
Results 1 to 10 of 439
Like Tree46Likes

Thread: Definitive Illegal Formation Rules

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    9
    I've a cup opponnent who set his tactic in strange way like this:
    GK-DL-DC-DMC-ML-MC-MC-AMC-AMC-ST-ST. I suppose it's illegal because number of defenders, but this gut is experienced and his team is strong, so I'm not sure if this is illegal. Could you guys confirm?

  2. #2
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2
    Definitive Illegal Formation Rules-formation.jpg
    I played with this formation 2 seasons and no problem ... and last matches i always have 20 % possesion .. can you pls fix this or tell me what to do ?

  3. #3
    Champion Saransh Vatsa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Milky Way
    Posts
    2,814
    Quote Originally Posted by Little_camel View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	formation.jpg 
Views:	73 
Size:	100.0 KB 
ID:	15208
    I played with this formation 2 seasons and no problem ... and last matches i always have 20 % possesion .. can you pls fix this or tell me what to do ?
    I don't know why this happened??? 4-1-2-1-2 ND is a legal formation d is widely used, it is one of my fav. Other things also seem fine. Was ur opponent much higher Quality than u????

  4. #4
    Addicted Razz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    State of Montana, USA
    Posts
    586
    Quote Originally Posted by Little_camel View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	formation.jpg 
Views:	73 
Size:	100.0 KB 
ID:	15208
    I played with this formation 2 seasons and no problem ... and last matches i always have 20 % possesion .. can you pls fix this or tell me what to do ?
    Can you post some screenshots showing the possession, and the opponent's team?
    ~^~*~^~ My opinions are best when taken with a grain of salt. No iodine added. ~^~*~^~

  5. #5
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    8

    Lightbulb

    So I've made a formation, had 20% possesion because it's illegal (didnt know there are illegal formations at all back then), checked the forum, fixed the prob, everything is okay now.
    Definitive Illegal Formation Rules-form.jpg Definitive Illegal Formation Rules-ss1.jpg
    I actually won that game, but I was stunned by the possesion, so I set up a friendly match and had the same possesion (understandable 20-80) and lost to a guy, that I won 2 days before that without a problem.

    But my question is, that formation I used, it's a well known formation in real-life football (I was told it's called the MW formation), why is it illegal in the game? I understand its because of only 2 players in the last line but still, it's a good formation that shouldn't be illegal.
    Please notice that DML, DMC and DMR are playing defensively, too.
    Last edited by Pivac Momčina; 11-23-2013 at 05:50 AM.

  6. #6
    Addicted Razz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    State of Montana, USA
    Posts
    586
    Quote Originally Posted by Pivac Momčina View Post
    But my question is, that formation I used, it's a well known formation in real-life football (I was told it's called the MW formation), why is it illegal in the game? I understand its because of only 2 players in the last line but still, it's a good formation that shouldn't be illegal.
    Please notice that DML, DMC and DMR are playing defensively, too.
    From the first post:
    Quote Originally Posted by Razz View Post

    Please note:

    1. "Illegal formation" means it incurs a possession penalty in the game Top Eleven.
    2. We can't change that, if you don't like it, take it up with Nordeus.
    3. Using an Illegal formation results in 20% possession. Yes, you might still win.
    4. The above "rules" have been TESTED and confirmed many times. They are accurate to the best of my knowledge.
    5. Please provide evidence (in-game screenshots) if you believe the findings above are wrong. "That's not true" because "I used ...." or "I played against ..." comments will be ignored without supporting evidence (screenshots).
    6. Post-match results are inconclusive for various reasons. If a formation appears to be legal, but shows a 20% possession in post-match results (one you didn't watch), first check the GK in the game - if that is his natural position, and you find no other reason for the possession penalty, test the formation yourself. If it IS illegal, make a screenshot and post here please.

    ~^~*~^~ My opinions are best when taken with a grain of salt. No iodine added. ~^~*~^~

  7. #7
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    8
    Quote Originally Posted by Razz View Post
    From the first post:
    [/LIST]
    [/SIZE][/SIZE]
    thank you sherlock, that was a rethorical question so that everyone could think about it for a sec, idgaf about that and i'm not gonna take it to nordeus lol

  8. #8
    Addicted Razz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    State of Montana, USA
    Posts
    586
    Quote Originally Posted by JanCz View Post
    I've a cup opponnent who set his tactic in strange way like this:
    GK-DL-DC-DMC-ML-MC-MC-AMC-AMC-ST-ST. I suppose it's illegal because number of defenders, but this gut is experienced and his team is strong, so I'm not sure if this is illegal. Could you guys confirm?
    Two backline defenders makes it illegal, yes. Also, no right winger makes it illegal.
    ~^~*~^~ My opinions are best when taken with a grain of salt. No iodine added. ~^~*~^~