View Poll Results: Should this thread be sticky?
- Voters
- 14. You may not vote on this poll
46Likes
-
Newbie
Here's a formation that should be considered illegal per your second rule (Some combination of at least 3 defenders (i.e. 3 players anywhere in the back row [DL, DC, DR] )) , but as you can see, it's not. I've considered recently trying a formation with 2 DCs and 3 DMs (DML, DMR, DMR) and I don't think it should be deemed illegal as well.
View image: Screenshot (29)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules