Is it 2-1-4-3 Good formation for attacking and dominating match ?

[Firat Sayginer]

Hi guys i was wondering is it 2-1-4-3 is good in attacking and also dominating match and defends midfield:
Here is a exact formation:
-------ST--ST--ST-------
--AML--------------AMR--
--------------------------
------MC--------MC------
--------------------------
-----------DMC-----------
--------------------------
------DC--------DC-------
--------------------------
-----------GK-------------

For this formation what orders needed for good attacking for scores and also good defends for not to take goals.
Thanks...

[Chris Rath]

You will only get 20% possession each match because that formation has less than 3 defenders.
But can switch to 3N-DMC-2MC-AML-AMR-2ST, 3N-3MC-AML-AMR-2ST or 3N-2MC-AML-AMR-3ST and have an offensive legit formaion.

[Firat Sayginer]

So you mean like this ?

---------ST---ST---------
--AML--------------AMR--
--------------------------
------MC--------MC------
--------------------------
-----------DMC-----------
--------------------------
------DC---DC---DC-------
--------------------------
-----------GK-------------

[fadhul17]

So you mean like this ?

---------ST---ST---------
--AML--------------AMR--
--------------------------
------MC--------MC------
--------------------------
-----------DMC-----------
--------------------------
------DC---DC---DC-------
--------------------------
-----------GK-------------

That's better thn the first

[Firat Sayginer]

LoL my last positiopn was 4-3-3 i was won 26-25 1 draw 0 lost i got bored so is it this position better than 4-3-3 ?

[Firat Sayginer]

That's better thn the first

What about this one:
---------ST---ST---------
--AML--------------AMR--
--------------------------
------MC--------MC------
--------------------------
-----------DMC-----------
--------------------------
--DL-------DC-------DR--
--------------------------
-----------GK-------------

[Firat Sayginer]

You will only get 20% possession each match because that formation has less than 3 defenders.
But can switch to 3N-DMC-2MC-AML-AMR-2ST, 3N-3MC-AML-AMR-2ST or 3N-2MC-AML-AMR-3ST and have an offensive legit formaion.

What about this one:
---------ST---ST---------
--AML--------------AMR--
--------------------------
------MC--------MC------
--------------------------
-----------DMC-----------
--------------------------
--DL-------DC-------DR--
--------------------------
-----------GK-------------

Is it This formation is better than 4-3-3 ?

[Chris Rath]

Yeah, both formations are legit.

---------ST---ST---------
--AML--------------AMR--
--------------------------
------MC--------MC------
--------------------------
-----------DMC-----------
--------------------------
------DC---DC---DC-------
--------------------------
-----------GK-------------

That formation blocks the center massively. If your opponent has no AMC, you can put a red arrow on your DMC.
The system has one weakness: I does not block opponents AML/AMR.

---------ST---ST---------
--AML--------------AMR--
--------------------------
------MC--------MC------
--------------------------
-----------DMC-----------
--------------------------
--DL-------DC-------DR--
--------------------------
-----------GK-------------

The second formation blocks AML/AMR, but has only one DC. If your opponents players with 2 ST you need to put a blue arrow on your DMC to support the defense. While when he plays with 3 ST you usually get a problem. Try the first formation then (if he has no AMC).

To make both formations shine, you need quality wingers (AML, AMR).

[Firat Sayginer]

Yeah, both formations are legit.

---------ST---ST---------
--AML--------------AMR--
--------------------------
------MC--------MC------
--------------------------
-----------DMC-----------
--------------------------
------DC---DC---DC-------
--------------------------
-----------GK-------------

That formation blocks the center massively. If your opponent has no AMC, you can put a red arrow on your DMC.
The system has one weakness: I does not block opponents AML/AMR.

---------ST---ST---------
--AML--------------AMR--
--------------------------
------MC--------MC------
--------------------------
-----------DMC-----------
--------------------------
--DL-------DC-------DR--
--------------------------
-----------GK-------------

The second formation blocks AML/AMR, but has only one DC. If your opponents players with 2 ST you need to put a blue arrow on your DMC to support the defense. While when he plays with 3 ST you usually get a problem. Try the first formation then (if he has no AMC).

To make both formations shine, you need quality wingers (AML, AMR).

Thank you very much for help have a nice day

[aster]

2 defenders is suicide - you will be overrun by your opponents.

As a minimum you need 3-4 defenders, so depending on your opponents formation you would use 3N or 4.