For the case like these:
The game engine should modify for Auto-sub funtions;
have more precised auto subs for e'position.
have first 11 auto choices.
auto formation/tactic changes.
Printable View
For the case like these:
The game engine should modify for Auto-sub funtions;
have more precised auto subs for e'position.
have first 11 auto choices.
auto formation/tactic changes.
Yes 4-4-2 classic will be good, it is hard to beat. As for the red card issue, even 4-2-2-2 Hexagon won't give illegal formation:cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by July Fourth
But that is when u r not watching the match. If u r watching, then it depends very much on ur opponent. u will advice u
3N-1-2N-2W-2(3N-5-2V) against any formation that doesn't play wingers, like ND, 4-1-3N-2, 4-3n-1-2, 4-3-3, etc.
For the rest, go 4-4-2, 4-1-3N-2 or 4-2-2-2 Hexagon
EDIT: I saw ur team. For 3-5-2 v and Hexagon, u can play ur 5* ML as AML. He shouldn't be bad. He might prove better:)
won 5 of 8 and 1 draw with asymmetrical formation and happy with it but yess i think that i could have won more with 4-3n-1-2
agree with the july :DQuote:
Originally Posted by July Fourth