Page 11 of 125 FirstFirst ... 9101112132161111 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 1248
Like Tree173Likes

Thread: Table of Counter Formations - What to use?

  1. #101
    Addicted Chris Rath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    735
    Quote Originally Posted by semideias View Post
    Can anyone explain me what is the design of 3-2-2-2-1 Butterfly tactic?
    There you go.

    Quote Originally Posted by dv8r View Post
    ...
    3-2-2-2-1 butterfly - 3 DCs, DML, DMR, MC, MC, AML, AMR and 1 striker
    Great thread, but I could not find this tactic, I have seen quite often recently.
    3-2-2-1-2
    ------ST-------ST------
    ----------AMC----------
    -------CM----CM-------
    -DML-------------DMR-
    ------DC-DC-DC-------

  2. #102
    VIP July Fourth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    15,386
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris Rath View Post
    There you go.



    Great thread, but I could not find this tactic, I have seen quite often recently.
    3-2-2-1-2
    ------ST-------ST------
    ----------AMC----------
    -------CM----CM-------
    -DML-------------DMR-
    ------DC-DC-DC-------
    Added that formation to the list of formations to try and find a suitable counter.
    *Retired From Top Eleven*

  3. #103
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    64
    Can anyone help me with the below? I lost against this formation, think I used 4-5-1V:

    Quote Originally Posted by Rob1984 View Post
    What's best vs 4-2n-1-2n-1?

    I know up front i should have aml, amr and one st. But what in defence and midfield? I need to exploit their lack of wingers, but it's really strong down the middle.

    3-2n-2n-2w-1 or 4-1n-2n-2w-1 (451v)? Or something else?

  4. #104
    Famous Accyrover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1,553
    Quote Originally Posted by July Fourth View Post
    Added that formation to the list of formations to try and find a suitable counter.
    Untested but 3N-1-3W-2N-1 would counter it, how effectively is a different matter.
    Or 3N-1-3W-1-2, think the first would be better with the stronger MF.
    July Fourth likes this.
    Level 1,2,3,4,5,6 League winners

    Level 1,2,3,5 CL Winners

    Level 4 CL runner up.

    Level 2,3,4 Cup winners

    P267 W244 D2 L11 GF1024 GA91

  5. #105
    VIP July Fourth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    15,386
    Quote Originally Posted by Accyrover View Post
    Untested but 3N-1-3W-2N-1 would counter it, how effectively is a different matter.
    Or 3N-1-3W-1-2, think the first would be better with the stronger MF.
    Formation added, I think with your knowledge and success it shouldn't be a problem without testing.
    *Retired From Top Eleven*

  6. #106
    VIP dv8r's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    England
    Posts
    5,402
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris Rath View Post
    There you go.



    Great thread, but I could not find this tactic, I have seen quite often recently.
    3-2-2-1-2
    ------ST-------ST------
    ----------AMC----------
    -------CM----CM-------
    -DML-------------DMR-
    ------DC-DC-DC-------

    I call that the reverse/inverted 3-5-2 V... Seen it a few times, quite defensive but Accyrover has the solution


    Season 15 - Level 15

    League Winners (14) - Levels 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
    26-0-0 league (4) - Levels 3, 4, 7 & 8
    Undefeated in league (11) - Levels 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14
    Cup winners (2) - Level 1 & 14
    Cup 3rd place (1) - Level 12
    Champions League Winners (10) - Levels 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
    Champions League Runners up(1) - Level 9






    >My team<

  7. #107
    Famous Accyrover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1,553
    Play it as you see it up to the MF blocking them should leave you with an AMC and a Striker left over to attack his back line.
    Level 1,2,3,4,5,6 League winners

    Level 1,2,3,5 CL Winners

    Level 4 CL runner up.

    Level 2,3,4 Cup winners

    P267 W244 D2 L11 GF1024 GA91

  8. #108
    VIP dv8r's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    England
    Posts
    5,402
    I'm playing 3W-4-1-2 soon. The counter is not up there so I'll let you know what happens.

    I'll probably be playing 3N-3W-2N-1-1, which seems like a decent counter against the above formation.
    Last edited by dv8r; 02-19-2013 at 05:58 PM.


    Season 15 - Level 15

    League Winners (14) - Levels 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
    26-0-0 league (4) - Levels 3, 4, 7 & 8
    Undefeated in league (11) - Levels 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14
    Cup winners (2) - Level 1 & 14
    Cup 3rd place (1) - Level 12
    Champions League Winners (10) - Levels 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
    Champions League Runners up(1) - Level 9






    >My team<

  9. #109
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    64
    What's best vs 4-2n-1-2n-1? I've asked before but no reply. There's a team in my league playing it and he's won every game so far, even against me when I used 4-5-1V and today someone tried 3N-2N-1-3W-1 and also lost.

  10. #110
    Famous Accyrover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1,553
    I assume his MF is a tight X formation.
    I've not played against this formation but strength through the centre is needed while offering some form of attack down the wings.
    I'd opt for a defensive set up of 3N-3-2-1-1 with the DMR/DML preferable with MR/ML, with No! O/S and No! counter.
    See how it goes and add up arrows to the DMR/DML if need be.
    Level 1,2,3,4,5,6 League winners

    Level 1,2,3,5 CL Winners

    Level 4 CL runner up.

    Level 2,3,4 Cup winners

    P267 W244 D2 L11 GF1024 GA91

Page 11 of 125 FirstFirst ... 9101112132161111 ... LastLast