View Poll Results: Do you see this thread deserve to be sticky?

Voters
304. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, deserve to be sticky.

    278 91.45%
  • No, should be as it is.

    26 8.55%
Results 1 to 10 of 1997
Like Tree159Likes

  Click here to go to the first staff post in this thread.   Thread: How to Win Against Any Formation?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    13
    Hi I'm new to the forum and Top Eleven. I'm playing in my first season and I made it to the cup semi finals.

    How do I beat the following formation, the 4-1-3-2 Wide? I'm looking for alternative formations since I do not have a DML on my roster as I saw in many of the solutions including the beginning of this tread...

    DL DC DC DR
    DMC
    ML MC MR
    ST ST

    What I don't understand is this...

    Other formations known to beat 4-1-3-2 Wide 3:

    3-1-4-2 and 3-1-4-1-1 using normal mentality, zonal marking, own half, short passing, normal tackling, no counterattack and no offside trap.
    Does he mean narrow back three or wide back three for these two solutions. Also does a 4-5-1 V work? I lost 2-1 in the first leg (away) of my cup semi-final using the Maple Leaf formation.

  2. #2
    Famous Accyrover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1,553
    Quote Originally Posted by TheRainmaker View Post
    Hi I'm new to the forum and Top Eleven. I'm playing in my first season and I made it to the cup semi finals.

    How do I beat the following formation, the 4-1-3-2 Wide? I'm looking for alternative formations since I do not have a DML on my roster as I saw in many of the solutions including the beginning of this tread...

    DL DC DC DR
    DMC
    ML MC MR
    ST ST

    What I don't understand is this...



    Does he mean narrow back three or wide back three for these two solutions. Also does a 4-5-1 V work? I lost 2-1 in the first leg (away) of my cup semi-final using the Maple Leaf formation.
    Any formation consisting of two ST, you need three DC's when playing a flat three.
    Also, maple leaf how were the players set as there are two ways.
    Last edited by Accyrover; 01-06-2013 at 03:07 PM.
    Level 1,2,3,4,5,6 League winners

    Level 1,2,3,5 CL Winners

    Level 4 CL runner up.

    Level 2,3,4 Cup winners

    P267 W244 D2 L11 GF1024 GA91

  3. #3
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    13
    Quote Originally Posted by Accyrover View Post
    Any formation consisting of two ST, you need three DC's when playing a flat three.
    Also, maple leaf how were the players set as there are two ways.
    I only set my Maple Leaf with only one DC

    DL - DC - DR
    DMC DMC
    ML MC MR
    AMC
    ST ST

    I'll let you know of the result after the 2nd leg.
    Last edited by TheRainmaker; 01-06-2013 at 05:55 PM.

  4. #4
    Famous Accyrover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1,553
    Quote Originally Posted by TheRainmaker View Post
    I only set my Maple Leaf with only one DC

    DL - DC - DR
    DMC DMC
    ML MC MR
    AMC
    ST ST

    I'll let you know of the result after the 2nd leg.
    What orders do you play with?.
    Level 1,2,3,4,5,6 League winners

    Level 1,2,3,5 CL Winners

    Level 4 CL runner up.

    Level 2,3,4 Cup winners

    P267 W244 D2 L11 GF1024 GA91

  5. #5
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    13
    Originally Posted by TheRainmaker
    I only set my Maple Leaf with only one DC

    DL - DC - DR
    DMC DMC
    ML MC MR
    AMC
    ST ST

    I'll let you know of the result after the 2nd leg.
    What orders do you play with?.
    Before I reply. Correction: I only used one striker with AMC.

    My orders were normal attacking, through the middle, short passing, normal tacking, zonal marking. Counter and Trap were both off.

    I switched to two strikers by removing the AMC and changed it though both flanks in the second half and gave up no goals.
    Last edited by TheRainmaker; 01-06-2013 at 07:42 PM.