Results 1 to 6 of 6
Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By Duncton
  • 1 Post By nikolgiorgos

Thread: Asymmetrical 4-3N-3

  1. #1
    Dreamer
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    347

    Asymmetrical 4-3N-3

    I keep having bad results against teams with lower quality and especially so when they play in an asymmetrical formation (or that's when I notice the most). So tomorrow I'm facing this guy and I'd like to hear your suggestions.

    Asymmetrical 4-3N-3-3133.jpg

    Thought about 4-1-4-1, but that would mean I can't field my best players. I have and AMC/AMR who's performing really well at the moment.

  2. #2
    Newbie Exforgant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    49
    htctopeleven.com/2016/01/4-3-3-classic-howtobeat.html
    Try this, it should work! Good luck!
    THEY WANT MORE CONTENT TOP ELEVEN?
    How To Counter Top Eleven

    URL redirection is only fitting, it will straight to the site.

  3. #3
    Dreamer
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    347
    Thanks. I actually played 4-3N-2W-1 in our first match and lost 1-0. More posession, more shots, less on target. But my settings may have been a bit different. So I might try that.

    I don't like however playing my AMR directly opposite his DML. Would 4-3N-1-2 (mixed passing, reds on wingbacks) be an option? Or would that be a bad idea since he's strong through the middle?
    nikolgiorgos likes this.

  4. #4
    Greek Forum Moderator nikolgiorgos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    17,714
    don't get confused with asymmetrical formations.
    Consider those as close to the normal ones and set your team by that.
    This formation looks like a 4-3-3 so I suggest
    3N-1DMC-2MC- AML-C-R - 1ST
    or
    3N-1DMC-3MC-AML-R - 1ST
    I would go for defense/counter and wait to see how is it going.
    Duncton likes this.
    Καλώς ήρθατε στο Ελληνικό φόρουμ
    http://forum.topeleven.com/%CE%93%CE...%B4%CE%B1.html

  5. #5
    Dreamer
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    347
    I try not to, but I alway seem to struggle when facing one.

    I like your first option, since my attack would depend less on my AMR. I do have the players to pull it off. I'll let you know what happened.

  6. #6
    Dreamer
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    347
    Well, I won. I also struggled.

    Came online in 50th minute (I thought I was playing later). Still 0-0, so I changed to attacking. Then a lot started to happen. I almost immediately scored the first goal. Opponent got a free kick (yellow card) which led to a penalty (yellow card) and the eqaulizer. Another free kick and yellow card after that, but luckily I managed to score once more towards the end of the match.

    Six points difference in avq. It does show in the stats but not in the score.

    Thanks for your replies.

    Asymmetrical 4-3N-3-won1.jpg
    Asymmetrical 4-3N-3-won2.jpg