10Likes
Threaded View

Zoran Vitas is there any way to logically... 05-01-2016,
11:08 AM

Zoran Vitas ok, i'll try that once again! 05-01-2016,
01:38 PM

Zoran Vitas lost all too easily mate... 05-02-2016,
09:32 AM

Tactician No. It is 4-5-1(V) that is... 05-02-2016,
09:46 AM

Tactician I have sent you one set of... 05-02-2016,
09:56 AM

Andrew Nifield I dont think that it's too... 05-03-2016,
03:18 PM

Craig Gareppo I also struggle eveytime i... 05-09-2016,
09:39 PM

babarkhurshid 4-4-2 sometimes make it... 05-10-2016,
05:05 AM

cookizzz You may try... 05-10-2016,
05:39 AM

Abhinavsharma 3W-2dmc-3W-amc-st is best... 05-10-2016,
06:05 AM

pcmacdaniel The difficult aspect of... 05-10-2016,
05:43 PM

Zoran Vitas ok, it seems this works... 05-29-2016,
04:58 PM

Tactician I no longer help people... 06-04-2016,
12:06 PM

Dimitri Phome Vegas MC could be blued so that... 06-04-2016,
01:14 PM

Zoran Vitas i agree that is important to... 06-05-2016,
07:16 PM

stinkybg i won today 6 : 2 w 43n12... 04-13-2017,
01:07 PM

Adonara SC i think it depends on your... 05-26-2017,
08:03 AM

ronnymvc This season I used with... 05-27-2017,
08:37 AM

pompeypaul Try 4-4-1-1, seems to work... 06-25-2017,
10:13 AM
-
is there any way to logically beat 4-4-2 ?
it's just random it seems, playing indentical games doesn't yield any logic at all...
i played a game against a 4-4-2 side i am much stronger compared too using also 4-4-2. lost, no way of reaching a chance to score.
has anyone found a solution or is 4-4-2 simply overrrated?
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules