Someone tell me flaws of 4231

[Dimitri Phome Vegas]

Ok so Ive gone back into the game after a sabatical of 3months but anyways, going back in, Ive decided to use 4231 with reds on DL/DR and Aml/Amr, but the choice for passing and central play or wide play I change according to opponent tactics and it works like magic, winning against 433, 361 and 1 other formation I forgot but point is, I would like to know about the possible flaws of my formation and tactics so any reply regarding my post will be much appreciated.
I use counterattack and hard tackling and attacking mentality btw.

[nikolgiorgos]

- if oppo has two good AMR-L better not use red arrows to your DR-L
- counter attack, is more helpful with defense
- if you play attack and oppo playing defense/counter/long pass , the lack of DMC maybe 'll cost you
- using hard tackling, in some games maybe cause cards/injuries or many F-K from your opponent

[Dimitri Phome Vegas]

- if oppo has two good AMR-L better not use red arrows to your DR-L
- counter attack, is more helpful with defense
- if you play attack and oppo playing defense/counter/long pass , the lack of DMC maybe 'll cost you
- using hard tackling, in some games maybe cause cards/injuries or many F-K from your opponent

Many thx!
Tho Ive lost a game against 4132 so Im changing my tactics to 32221:
-DC-DC-DC-
DML--DMR
-MC--MC-
AML(Up)--AMR(Up)
-ST-
Short passing, zones, offside trap, play wide, attacking mentality, counterattack and hard tackling.
Will I beat his 4132 with my 32221 formation and if yes, do tell me any flaws for my new formation, and if no, what else works against this 4132, bearing in mind that this is the 2nd leg of the cup at home and i lost 2-1 away using my previous 4231 formation.
Many thanks in advance for any and every opinions posted.

[nikolgiorgos]

attacking mentality, counterattack

not together

also this formation you have, has many defenders for "attack".
Better choose defense/counter/flanks

4132

> you mean 1DMC +3MC +2ST ?

Well, in that case I prefer to play with 3DC +1DMC +3MC +AML-R +ST
but yes, maybe your formation could work too.
Depending if DML-R can help in attack.

[Dimitri Phome Vegas]

not together

also this formation you have, has many defenders for "attack".
Better choose defense/counter/flanks

> you mean 1DMC +3MC +2ST ?

Well, in that case I prefer to play with 3DC +1DMC +3MC +AML-R +ST
but yes, maybe your formation could work too.
Depending if DML-R can help in attack.

Ha! Beat him 3-0 second leg using 31312
DL/DC/DR
DMC(down)
ML/MC/MR
AMC(Up)
ST/ST